(Q - ??: only 2 enigmas require the solution of the previous one, the others are independent and it is up to us to see how, on a methodological level, the sequence of enigmas is constructed and linked together, can it be
specify the method?)
MB : there is a big difference between what Max Valentin was able to say or answer in the amdits and what MB can answer today to the questions. The difference is the following is that when Max Valentin answered, it was first, the first answers while MB answers second, that is to say that more or indirectly he is asked the same questions so all the answers he gives have a boomerang effect, that is to say that as she will confront, collide) Max Valentin's original response and how to indicate, specify a certain clarification on his part without distorting the game?
(Q - ??: at what point in the puzzles, at what point in the hunt, are we supposed to understand that we are on the right path, to understand a notion of logical, methodological sequence in the construction of this hunt?)
MB : the level of credit, of genius that we were ready to give to Max Valentin, gave us the level of complexity with which we were ready to confront for the puzzles. But if we manage to say to ourselves that he wasn't any more brilliant than us, we begin to be able to work correctly on the puzzles, otherwise we can get into some mind-blowing things.
(Q - ??: is there still a common thread in this hunt and if so are we supposed to discover it at the start or during the puzzles or at the end?)< /i>
MB : when we tackle the enigmas we have to trust ourselves, we make our own research and personal convictions.
MB : there is a big difference between what Max Valentin was able to say or answer in the amdits and what MB can answer today to the questions. The difference is the following is that when Max Valentin answered, it was first, the first answers while MB answers second, that is to say that more or indirectly he is asked the same questions so all the answers he gives have a boomerang effect, that is to say that as she will confront, collide) Max Valentin's original response and how to indicate, specify a certain clarification on his part without distorting the game?
(Q - ??: at what point in the puzzles, at what point in the hunt, are we supposed to understand that we are on the right path, to understand a notion of logical, methodological sequence in the construction of this hunt?)
MB : the level of credit, of genius that we were ready to give to Max Valentin, gave us the level of complexity with which we were ready to confront for the puzzles. But if we manage to say to ourselves that he wasn't any more brilliant than us, we begin to be able to work correctly on the puzzles, otherwise we can get into some mind-blowing things.
(Q - ??: is there still a common thread in this hunt and if so are we supposed to discover it at the start or during the puzzles or at the end?)< /i>
MB : when we tackle the enigmas we have to trust ourselves, we make our own research and personal convictions.