(Q - aladore: what to trust then?)
MB : without joking you have to trust the book, all the elements necessary for hunting are in the book, whatever edition (if texts no longer appear there it is because they have no impact). Beyond that, there is no discussion. You need a map, it's an essential tool, the precise map of the final area of ??course is useful, but initially you need a map of France, that's obvious. When he says you need a compass, there are times you can do without one, but a compass always serves a purpose in a story like that. why try to say there is no need for it? This is a good example, if an organizer tells us there is no need for a compass, this necessarily eliminates certain research, certain attitudes, certain positioning, why give up using a compass since it can be useful to us. He tells us as it should be said! Have a compass! If you use it it's great, if you don't use it it doesn't take up too much space in your pocket. Why say there is a need or no need. He can say that when we do certain scouting at night, there are times when we have difficulty orienting ourselves or spotting certain things so why not.
(Q - aladore: talk about the pile-up when we're at the end of it?)
MB : not necessarily but in any case for the fool yes he said it he won't come back to it so for him it's absolutely useful to have a compass
(Q - aladore: but we don't need a compass in our pocket while solving the puzzles, do we agree?)
MB : The compass is a field instrument, we can place it on a map but the maps are oriented, we know where north is, ultimately it's not of much use but on the other hand, the compass is a field tool, so from the moment you go into the field, there is a compass in your pocket that can always be useful to us. he thinks that we can do without it, he has thought about it, indeed we can consider that we can do without it but why go into these considerations for goodness sake. The fact of saying we can do without a compass or not without a compass is already fueling our thoughts when we shouldn't even be thinking about it? A map you need one, a compass you need one, a square, a pencil, a ruler take the amtos and then do the job, you don't have to ask yourself the question of knowing if there is a need for this isntrument because it induces a discussion on how this or that puzzle works and it completely drowns out what should be the player's center of interest. we take the instruments and we talk more about it.
MB : without joking you have to trust the book, all the elements necessary for hunting are in the book, whatever edition (if texts no longer appear there it is because they have no impact). Beyond that, there is no discussion. You need a map, it's an essential tool, the precise map of the final area of ??course is useful, but initially you need a map of France, that's obvious. When he says you need a compass, there are times you can do without one, but a compass always serves a purpose in a story like that. why try to say there is no need for it? This is a good example, if an organizer tells us there is no need for a compass, this necessarily eliminates certain research, certain attitudes, certain positioning, why give up using a compass since it can be useful to us. He tells us as it should be said! Have a compass! If you use it it's great, if you don't use it it doesn't take up too much space in your pocket. Why say there is a need or no need. He can say that when we do certain scouting at night, there are times when we have difficulty orienting ourselves or spotting certain things so why not.
(Q - aladore: talk about the pile-up when we're at the end of it?)
MB : not necessarily but in any case for the fool yes he said it he won't come back to it so for him it's absolutely useful to have a compass
(Q - aladore: but we don't need a compass in our pocket while solving the puzzles, do we agree?)
MB : The compass is a field instrument, we can place it on a map but the maps are oriented, we know where north is, ultimately it's not of much use but on the other hand, the compass is a field tool, so from the moment you go into the field, there is a compass in your pocket that can always be useful to us. he thinks that we can do without it, he has thought about it, indeed we can consider that we can do without it but why go into these considerations for goodness sake. The fact of saying we can do without a compass or not without a compass is already fueling our thoughts when we shouldn't even be thinking about it? A map you need one, a compass you need one, a square, a pencil, a ruler take the amtos and then do the job, you don't have to ask yourself the question of knowing if there is a need for this isntrument because it induces a discussion on how this or that puzzle works and it completely drowns out what should be the player's center of interest. we take the instruments and we talk more about it.