(Q - ??: I wanted to ask you a question about the super-entity. There is one thing that I don't understand. How can it be declared a super-entity in the sense that
she did not do the review, that she would have gone beyond, but would not have gone to the super-solution Because normally, after the review, we arrive at the super-solution?
how can it be validated in the sense that it went, it's in the right direction, but it's not the great solution?)
MB: I think I understand the question. Let's say that it is someone who, through what they have understood, a person who, through what they have understood, is therefore approaching the super solution. I don't see what's incongruous or surprising?
(Q - ??: Because normally, you said that you have to do the review to arrive at the great solution.
MB: Yes, well, she did.
(Q - ??: If she doesn't do the review, but she still has…)
MB: No, she did the review, no, no. It was his deduction from the review that interested me.
(Q - ??: Ok, fine, and when you say she's already in the sequel, what does that mean?)
MB: She went on to talk about lots of things. She's looking for answers to all of this, this entity.
(Q - ??: Ok.)
MB: Sequels that don’t necessarily exist.
(Q - ??: This entity is located at the last markers?
MB: I think that here we are attacking the vocal phase where I will have to run away. Because you are trying to corner me with an obvious application, it is very well done, but at some point, inevitably, I will notice…
(Q - ??: If she has made the correct review with the correct sentries, she is at the last benchmarks.)
MB: Well yes, yes, obviously. The question does not even arise.
(Q - ??: But if it's not the right solution, the right thing, you won't validate.)
MB: The right solution does not... It does not accept imprecision. The right solution is the right solution. There can't be one good solution, pretty much. If we find the right solution, we find something specific, so there is no doubt.
MB: I think I understand the question. Let's say that it is someone who, through what they have understood, a person who, through what they have understood, is therefore approaching the super solution. I don't see what's incongruous or surprising?
(Q - ??: Because normally, you said that you have to do the review to arrive at the great solution.
MB: Yes, well, she did.
(Q - ??: If she doesn't do the review, but she still has…)
MB: No, she did the review, no, no. It was his deduction from the review that interested me.
(Q - ??: Ok, fine, and when you say she's already in the sequel, what does that mean?)
MB: She went on to talk about lots of things. She's looking for answers to all of this, this entity.
(Q - ??: Ok.)
MB: Sequels that don’t necessarily exist.
(Q - ??: This entity is located at the last markers?
MB: I think that here we are attacking the vocal phase where I will have to run away. Because you are trying to corner me with an obvious application, it is very well done, but at some point, inevitably, I will notice…
(Q - ??: If she has made the correct review with the correct sentries, she is at the last benchmarks.)
MB: Well yes, yes, obviously. The question does not even arise.
(Q - ??: But if it's not the right solution, the right thing, you won't validate.)
MB: The right solution does not... It does not accept imprecision. The right solution is the right solution. There can't be one good solution, pretty much. If we find the right solution, we find something specific, so there is no doubt.