(Q - CatsEyes: I also have one last question. Otherwise, I'll regret not having asked it.
MB: The only doubt I have is whether it will really be the last. Okay, let's go.
(Q - CatsEyes: Are the gestures we have at Sentinels important in the story?
MB: The gestures?
(Q - CatsEyes: Yes.)
MB: What do you include in gestures? Traditionally, when we talk about an actor's gestures, it's a lot of the hands, or is that what you mean? Or is it larger?)
(Q - CatsEyes: A gesture, gesture.)
MB: What does that include? All the “body language”, all the behavior of the body, the attitudes?
(Q - CatsEyes: Yes, the movement of our body.)
MB: Does it matter? Is that the question?
(Q - CatsEyes: Yes.)
MB: Yes, in a way, yes, yes.
(Q - Sylvain: Wow, we're going to speculate on that!)
MB: No, but we shouldn't... When we shot this little sequence in Lyon, and thanks to the fact that Ash lent himself to the game, if I dare say, obviously we saw that he had different attitudes and behaviors in the different reviews.
(Q - CatsEyes: Is that ultimately what matters most in the review? Because I have the impression that we are more focused on, as you say say, the reviewer rather than the sentries?)
MB: What matters most is the review.
(Q - CatsEyes: It's the action, it's not the sentries, it's not the reviewer, it's the action.)
MB: Of course, that’s what we have to draw/deduce from it.
(Q - Roc: the role…)
(Q - CatsEyes: So the fact that his head is crooked and so on and we finally move into the position like that…)
(Q - Gringos: There's a trick there, Max, he used the review to image, and even without that, he could perhaps have found another trick, but hey, there...)
MB: It could have been presented differently, but it's particularly well presented like that, yes.
(Q - Roc: And in the Specifications, it said “But before finding, the important thing is not to search”. So, it emphasizes what we do while we search?)
MB: Yes, well, Roc, don't forget that he was a communicator, our friend Max. So, there is some controversy surrounding all that. It’s sure, they’re nice little sentences, “Wasn’t the important thing to search, eh, eh…?? You’re happy, you didn’t find anything, you’re happy eh!” You should also not pick up from noon to 2 p.m.
(Q - Syn: So, Michel, I'm going to talk again about what, once, I took Roc to task, telling him, they were talking about reviews, etc. And I said to Roc, imagine Roc that you have a twin, a second Roc who exists and there is the first Roc who comes into view and the second looks at the first Roc And I say to him maybe. that the second will capture things that the first will not capture. Is it a good vision of... can it be a good vision?)
. MB: I think that, if I understood correctly, I should be able to say that yes, it is a good vision. That’s a bit of what we did in Lyon, in fact. It's because we were watching...
(Q - Syn: Things in Lyon, on what was said afterwards, in fact, people were on..., in fact, the review includes two essential things. And in what was done in Lyon, the result in the debates of what I heard was focused on one of the things That is to say one of the things by putting oneself in Ash's place And on the other hand, by putting oneself. instead of the viewer, the second thing is more visible.)
MB: Well yes, finally, there were a lot of spectators, all the same. There are things that we saw and... I think that are important. But I admit that I have difficulty understanding the purpose of the question. So my first answer is to say yes, it is certain that Roc number 2 would surely see things that Roc number 1 would not see. Then where does that take us?
(Q - Syn: No, no, that's just it. That's what was important for me to emphasize, that is to say that by stepping back and by watching oneself do, there are things that one can capture, that one would not capture by doing the act itself, on which one would not necessarily be fixed.)< br /> MB: Yes, let's say that we have to be attentive to what we do, we must be able to do both at the same time. I understand, but you know, I draw the parallel with something that I said again, I think, at the beginning of the vocal, yes, and that I had to write, namely that if from time to time, you made recordings of your exchanges on the Discord and if you listened to them with as much attention as the vocals we do with me, you would surely learn things. This is what is very surprising.
(Q - Nlc: Can we stop beating around the bush and definitively confirm the fact that the expression is really the review?)
MB: I like to beat around the bush. It's funny.
(Q - CatsEyes: Yes, I like it too!)
MB: Yeah.
(Q - CatsEyes: Not bad, huh?)
MB: Well yes, then everyone makes their own convictions.
MB: The only doubt I have is whether it will really be the last. Okay, let's go.
(Q - CatsEyes: Are the gestures we have at Sentinels important in the story?
MB: The gestures?
(Q - CatsEyes: Yes.)
MB: What do you include in gestures? Traditionally, when we talk about an actor's gestures, it's a lot of the hands, or is that what you mean? Or is it larger?)
(Q - CatsEyes: A gesture, gesture.)
MB: What does that include? All the “body language”, all the behavior of the body, the attitudes?
(Q - CatsEyes: Yes, the movement of our body.)
MB: Does it matter? Is that the question?
(Q - CatsEyes: Yes.)
MB: Yes, in a way, yes, yes.
(Q - Sylvain: Wow, we're going to speculate on that!)
MB: No, but we shouldn't... When we shot this little sequence in Lyon, and thanks to the fact that Ash lent himself to the game, if I dare say, obviously we saw that he had different attitudes and behaviors in the different reviews.
(Q - CatsEyes: Is that ultimately what matters most in the review? Because I have the impression that we are more focused on, as you say say, the reviewer rather than the sentries?)
MB: What matters most is the review.
(Q - CatsEyes: It's the action, it's not the sentries, it's not the reviewer, it's the action.)
MB: Of course, that’s what we have to draw/deduce from it.
(Q - Roc: the role…)
(Q - CatsEyes: So the fact that his head is crooked and so on and we finally move into the position like that…)
(Q - Gringos: There's a trick there, Max, he used the review to image, and even without that, he could perhaps have found another trick, but hey, there...)
MB: It could have been presented differently, but it's particularly well presented like that, yes.
(Q - Roc: And in the Specifications, it said “But before finding, the important thing is not to search”. So, it emphasizes what we do while we search?)
MB: Yes, well, Roc, don't forget that he was a communicator, our friend Max. So, there is some controversy surrounding all that. It’s sure, they’re nice little sentences, “Wasn’t the important thing to search, eh, eh…?? You’re happy, you didn’t find anything, you’re happy eh!” You should also not pick up from noon to 2 p.m.
(Q - Syn: So, Michel, I'm going to talk again about what, once, I took Roc to task, telling him, they were talking about reviews, etc. And I said to Roc, imagine Roc that you have a twin, a second Roc who exists and there is the first Roc who comes into view and the second looks at the first Roc And I say to him maybe. that the second will capture things that the first will not capture. Is it a good vision of... can it be a good vision?)
. MB: I think that, if I understood correctly, I should be able to say that yes, it is a good vision. That’s a bit of what we did in Lyon, in fact. It's because we were watching...
(Q - Syn: Things in Lyon, on what was said afterwards, in fact, people were on..., in fact, the review includes two essential things. And in what was done in Lyon, the result in the debates of what I heard was focused on one of the things That is to say one of the things by putting oneself in Ash's place And on the other hand, by putting oneself. instead of the viewer, the second thing is more visible.)
MB: Well yes, finally, there were a lot of spectators, all the same. There are things that we saw and... I think that are important. But I admit that I have difficulty understanding the purpose of the question. So my first answer is to say yes, it is certain that Roc number 2 would surely see things that Roc number 1 would not see. Then where does that take us?
(Q - Syn: No, no, that's just it. That's what was important for me to emphasize, that is to say that by stepping back and by watching oneself do, there are things that one can capture, that one would not capture by doing the act itself, on which one would not necessarily be fixed.)< br /> MB: Yes, let's say that we have to be attentive to what we do, we must be able to do both at the same time. I understand, but you know, I draw the parallel with something that I said again, I think, at the beginning of the vocal, yes, and that I had to write, namely that if from time to time, you made recordings of your exchanges on the Discord and if you listened to them with as much attention as the vocals we do with me, you would surely learn things. This is what is very surprising.
(Q - Nlc: Can we stop beating around the bush and definitively confirm the fact that the expression is really the review?)
MB: I like to beat around the bush. It's funny.
(Q - CatsEyes: Yes, I like it too!)
MB: Yeah.
(Q - CatsEyes: Not bad, huh?)
MB: Well yes, then everyone makes their own convictions.