Moteur de recherche & Synthèse des "Midits" sur le jeu "Sur la trace de la Chouette d'Or ®"

<< Back

02/06/2024 - Vocal n° 69 - 2:47:00 00: Tools - No physical tools missing

(Q - Yapi: Can the mechanism that we take from the figures in the visual of the 650 still be used afterwards?)
MB: The mechanism is only used once.


(Q - Yapi: The mechanism is only used once, ok, and my second question, has anyone recently found the secret door that everyone is looking for, but can't find the right tunnel?)
MB: So, the secret door, clarify what you mean by secret door, I know I used that term. How do you see it?

(Q - Yapi: To have understood the mechanism of the numbers of the 650.)
MB: OK, we're talking about that. No, I'm wary, because I don't want us to be able to, let's say, provoke endless interpretations. So, is this... So, the question, if we take it in a more explicit way, is: has anyone understood the mechanism? Is that it?

(Q - Yapi: Yes, has anyone understood the mechanism, arrived, but no longer knows which way to go?)
MB: So... in the same way that we spoke earlier about the entity, then about an entity number 2 which also captured something. The mechanism itself, it's difficult to... It was understood, it was understood by, I use this terminology, by a certain number of cool people. There are a number of owls who understood the mechanism, but didn't quite understand the method, so this time, that is, how to apply it.
They understood the mechanism, but they did not understand that it was not a mechanism that can be applied just anyhow.

(Q - ??: Does the mechanism of numbers allow us to play the role, or not?)
MB: No, it’s the role that makes the mechanism work.

(Q - Madadia: I don't know if, the same, you can answer, but I had a question about the numbers to position the pile-up a little. You say that we can find it from certain way from home But can we understand the figures themselves, but do we have data on the Internet, for example, to be sure to understand them well? will have to go as far as sending the response to the verification site??)
MB: No, no, no. On the Internet, we can, thanks to the Internet, in any case, not on the Internet, but thanks to the Internet, we can understand them well, to use exactly the words used in the question, yes, yes.
Well, I came to say good evening, because you know that it's going to be another long vocal, that.

(Q - Xavier: Ah, that was a nice vocal, exceptional!)
MB: I didn't say too much nonsense, for once. I didn't leave too much to interpretation?

(Q - ??: Dabo is invalidated once again!)
(Q - ??: We're all going to Fontainebleau.)
MB: Did I invalidate Dabo? Did I invalidate Dabo? Tell me, tell me.

(Q - Nlc: You have to ask Yekoo, he was the one who confirmed that you had eliminated Dabo.)
MB: No joke. It seems that until the vocal was open to everyone, there was no recording. So, I invite you to strongly question the first participants, and surely, they will also have things to tell you.

(Q - Belou: Yeah, but if you chose Max Valentin, we're not in trouble.)
MB: No, no, not at all. I didn't choose anything, they came, they were the ones who came the fastest, and I told them, this is my new method, I delegate. So, we open gradually, I tell you things and then when it is fully opened, you will be there to answer for me since I told you before.)
Not bad. That way, it's interesting that you can capture the responses of those who were there at the beginning.