(Q - ??: [inaudible])
MB: Yes because you are one of the privileged people who were there at the beginning. I say it so that you are pestered with questions, I want you to be pestered with questions. Well, finally, finally, you've always dreamed of it.
(Q - ??: [inaudible])
MB: First of all, I think that it is not the entity that will find, because the entity is not aware of having something that would allow it to find. On the other hand, among a certain number of players, there really are a certain number who have picked up on things from Pierrette, sometimes very important things.
Some who analyze quite well the fact that the entity was able to capture without really being able to exploit what it captured, makes me say that it is someone else who risks finding it.
And among the cool people who are likely to find, I think that those who have a reasoning that fits as closely as possible with the key elements which appear in particular in Pierrette, are probably part of what we could perhaps call the leading group. But for me the entity is not the person who will find it for sure, far from it. This is the person who made me consider that the 30-year blockage could disappear, that this blockage was going to be lifted, that at least one person had understood, and God knows that the entity, it very well understood, but she did not realize that she understood what was essential to understand. But she understood. She wrote it, she understood it. She wrote it to me.
(Q - ??: [inaudible])
MB: So what do we call more advanced? Is that a concept that I would like to see clarified?
(Q - ??: [inaudible])
MB: The entity, for me, was for a moment, I said to myself, it's the most advanced person. Because I said to myself, with that, if she grasps the importance of what she has deduced, she will find it, that's for sure. Well no. So what does most advanced mean? That's the problem.
(Q - Roc: But it was Logic Innocent, entity number 2 who overtook the first?)
MB: Sorry?
(Q - Roc: These are your words, Logic Innocent, entity number 2 who surpassed the first!)
MB: Entity number 2, what I called entity number 2, is someone who captured major elements of Pierrette and, but who is missing what entity number 1 found without knowing. This possibility that she mentioned, if entity number 2 had it, entity number 2 would find it.
(Q - Roc: Is number 2 aware of having found it?)
MB: Number 2 is not more conscious than number 1. Let's say number 2 worked on her theory, But she is not more conscious.
MB: Yes because you are one of the privileged people who were there at the beginning. I say it so that you are pestered with questions, I want you to be pestered with questions. Well, finally, finally, you've always dreamed of it.
(Q - ??: [inaudible])
MB: First of all, I think that it is not the entity that will find, because the entity is not aware of having something that would allow it to find. On the other hand, among a certain number of players, there really are a certain number who have picked up on things from Pierrette, sometimes very important things.
Some who analyze quite well the fact that the entity was able to capture without really being able to exploit what it captured, makes me say that it is someone else who risks finding it.
And among the cool people who are likely to find, I think that those who have a reasoning that fits as closely as possible with the key elements which appear in particular in Pierrette, are probably part of what we could perhaps call the leading group. But for me the entity is not the person who will find it for sure, far from it. This is the person who made me consider that the 30-year blockage could disappear, that this blockage was going to be lifted, that at least one person had understood, and God knows that the entity, it very well understood, but she did not realize that she understood what was essential to understand. But she understood. She wrote it, she understood it. She wrote it to me.
(Q - ??: [inaudible])
MB: So what do we call more advanced? Is that a concept that I would like to see clarified?
(Q - ??: [inaudible])
MB: The entity, for me, was for a moment, I said to myself, it's the most advanced person. Because I said to myself, with that, if she grasps the importance of what she has deduced, she will find it, that's for sure. Well no. So what does most advanced mean? That's the problem.
(Q - Roc: But it was Logic Innocent, entity number 2 who overtook the first?)
MB: Sorry?
(Q - Roc: These are your words, Logic Innocent, entity number 2 who surpassed the first!)
MB: Entity number 2, what I called entity number 2, is someone who captured major elements of Pierrette and, but who is missing what entity number 1 found without knowing. This possibility that she mentioned, if entity number 2 had it, entity number 2 would find it.
(Q - Roc: Is number 2 aware of having found it?)
MB: Number 2 is not more conscious than number 1. Let's say number 2 worked on her theory, But she is not more conscious.