(Q - Exalastro: I'm trying to follow up a little with what Xavier said, so it's good because there, we have clarity between rules and methods. Regarding a little bit of what
we saw in the video with Ash's review, it's true that he had made several attempts, so in these methods, there is one that will be understood and kept, is that it?
, for example, I also liked your idea of ??the pianist, but compared to the review of Ash and the pianist, it doesn't matter, when someone tells me, OK, I taught you to play the piano, which is
well, that would be, above all, with your micrits, to take a step back, to say to yourself, today, on the edge of your home, on a blank sheet, not yet having the knowledge of the sentinels, perhaps some information
still to capture, we understand, that's it, the passage in view is important, but like the pianist, we could say to ourselves, I taught you to play on the piano Ok, great.
sit in front of a piano, have you learned the right method that will allow you to play a melody that will be pleasant to hear?
So, we are a bit in this situation.
There is still a goal.
We saw on the video with Ash and the review of the method attempts of which you highlighted that one was... there it is, that's it, it's a review, that's ok.
But today, there is still, it remains behind a goal, that is to say, we teach someone to play on the piano, it is obviously to play well without making wrong notes for example
.)
MB: Yes then it's very good, the example is perfectly adapted, we learn a piano method, then once we have acquired the piano method, that is to say the independence of the hands, finger independence, notes, music theory, whatever you want. Afterwards, there are scores, there are levels of difficulty in the scores. And there, when we talk about the last two enigmas, therefore the last solution, when we talk about all that, there is a level of score which is more or less difficult indeed and which requires a... It seems like a certain amount of training on the piano in what concerns us, a certain reflection in any case.
(Q - Exalastro: Okay, and the pirate, is this score a little complicated? Is that where the score is more complicated to play?)
MB: Yes, that’s where you need more or less tricks. If we compare with the piano, more or less virtuosity, flexibility. This is not necessarily within the reach of just anyone. In other cases, it is within the reach of many people.
(Q - Exalastro: A bit of dexterity, indeed.)
(Q - Exalastro: We talk a lot about method, but behind this method, can we also highlight the importance of the review? It's like the police, we train them to catching the thieves. The review, Ok, when we take the example of Macron, we wonder a little, it looks like a protocol, but basically, there was a mission behind it, there is indeed something which is also important to have to put at a time, we have to get something out of these passages in review, to be able to play on the piano, we expect that there will be no false notes, is- is it as important as the method somewhere? Well, I'm going to teach you how to play Ok, you know how to read the scores Ok, the one we have to find, it's perhaps a little more complex to find and to play, but behind it, there is also the objective of knowing how to play it well, well, I don't know how to express myself, to see a little, try to understand where I should put my thoughts currently .)
MB: When you take the example of Macron, you mentioned mission, there is a mission behind it, we don't care about Macron's mission, what interests us is the review, there in l 'occurrence.
When you quote Macron, you are talking about a review. So what's interesting is to see how he does it, how he does it.
(Q - Exalastro: At the time, you said, we will see the long hair, the crooked kepi. That, ultimately, the mission which was at the base, is still to 'ensure that everyone is well dressed, whatever, or their hair is well cut Here, you tell me somewhere that that's not the important thing. It's the method he's going to apply.)< /i>
MB: Well, if that’s what’s important. I didn't say that wasn't the important thing. There are definitely things to see, certainly. But you know, sometimes there are questions of logic. I think I've already used this example of three people who are in the desert with a donkey and who die from the heat. Then at some point, they have to stop because they are exhausted. And so, they stop and there is one who says, let's sit in the donkey's shade. And there is one who says I put myself in the shadow of the belly. Another who says, I'm going to put myself in the shadow of the head. Then the last one, he said, I only have the shadow of the tail left, I'm going to stand in the shadow of the tail. And they say, which is the most unfortunate? What do you answer?
(Q - ??: The donkey?)
MB: Yes, that’s it. Yes, it's the donkey. And we often forget that one. And that is perhaps something to think about in our situation.
(Q - ??: Are you, MB, the donkey or what?)
MB: Maybe it's me, I'm an ass in my style, that's for sure. I like playing the donkey anyway.
(Q - ??: He can still get shit on himself.)
MB: Yes, no, but then, these are extremely virile and scatological considerations, but that is not the debate. In the desert anyway, since he has nothing to eat, he's not going to give you a ton.
MB: Yes then it's very good, the example is perfectly adapted, we learn a piano method, then once we have acquired the piano method, that is to say the independence of the hands, finger independence, notes, music theory, whatever you want. Afterwards, there are scores, there are levels of difficulty in the scores. And there, when we talk about the last two enigmas, therefore the last solution, when we talk about all that, there is a level of score which is more or less difficult indeed and which requires a... It seems like a certain amount of training on the piano in what concerns us, a certain reflection in any case.
(Q - Exalastro: Okay, and the pirate, is this score a little complicated? Is that where the score is more complicated to play?)
MB: Yes, that’s where you need more or less tricks. If we compare with the piano, more or less virtuosity, flexibility. This is not necessarily within the reach of just anyone. In other cases, it is within the reach of many people.
(Q - Exalastro: A bit of dexterity, indeed.)
(Q - Exalastro: We talk a lot about method, but behind this method, can we also highlight the importance of the review? It's like the police, we train them to catching the thieves. The review, Ok, when we take the example of Macron, we wonder a little, it looks like a protocol, but basically, there was a mission behind it, there is indeed something which is also important to have to put at a time, we have to get something out of these passages in review, to be able to play on the piano, we expect that there will be no false notes, is- is it as important as the method somewhere? Well, I'm going to teach you how to play Ok, you know how to read the scores Ok, the one we have to find, it's perhaps a little more complex to find and to play, but behind it, there is also the objective of knowing how to play it well, well, I don't know how to express myself, to see a little, try to understand where I should put my thoughts currently .)
MB: When you take the example of Macron, you mentioned mission, there is a mission behind it, we don't care about Macron's mission, what interests us is the review, there in l 'occurrence.
When you quote Macron, you are talking about a review. So what's interesting is to see how he does it, how he does it.
(Q - Exalastro: At the time, you said, we will see the long hair, the crooked kepi. That, ultimately, the mission which was at the base, is still to 'ensure that everyone is well dressed, whatever, or their hair is well cut Here, you tell me somewhere that that's not the important thing. It's the method he's going to apply.)< /i>
MB: Well, if that’s what’s important. I didn't say that wasn't the important thing. There are definitely things to see, certainly. But you know, sometimes there are questions of logic. I think I've already used this example of three people who are in the desert with a donkey and who die from the heat. Then at some point, they have to stop because they are exhausted. And so, they stop and there is one who says, let's sit in the donkey's shade. And there is one who says I put myself in the shadow of the belly. Another who says, I'm going to put myself in the shadow of the head. Then the last one, he said, I only have the shadow of the tail left, I'm going to stand in the shadow of the tail. And they say, which is the most unfortunate? What do you answer?
(Q - ??: The donkey?)
MB: Yes, that’s it. Yes, it's the donkey. And we often forget that one. And that is perhaps something to think about in our situation.
(Q - ??: Are you, MB, the donkey or what?)
MB: Maybe it's me, I'm an ass in my style, that's for sure. I like playing the donkey anyway.
(Q - ??: He can still get shit on himself.)
MB: Yes, no, but then, these are extremely virile and scatological considerations, but that is not the debate. In the desert anyway, since he has nothing to eat, he's not going to give you a ton.