(Q - Xavier: When we get to the gear change, when we get to the sentries, do we have rules to respect? I mean rules, that is to say
that there are things more or less established, that we must do like this, like that, like that, you spoke vaguely about something like that Where we still have imposed rules. That works.
This doesn't work. It has to work. Can there be this kind of thing or not at all?)
MB: When are we on the last two?
(Q - Xavier: Yes, in the last two, do we have rules to respect? That is to say things, we have to do that. Well, there are the review. We know that we are coming, blablabla. Do we have rules to respect? That is to say that we realize that certain things, like we have rules, that? , we can do that. We can't do that.)
MB: Give me an example of a rule.
(Q - Xavier: The best known, let's take for example the game of chess, we have pieces that move in such a way, in checkers the same, we have rules in all games, established rules, we will consider as in chess that they are established and we must respect these rules or not at all. This means that we do things a little as we want, we check if it works without knowing these. That is to say that the fact of saying, for example, for a lady, we know very well that a lady is not going to move from right to left. )
MB: I understand. I lay down the method rule as we talked about it earlier. So indeed, there is a method to capture. Afterwards, there is no other.
(Q - Xavier: Okay, that is to say that in any case, there is something to do and we have to do this and that, that, we don't do it and we have to do the right thing. That is to say, there is a trick and it only works with that.)
MB: There you go.
(Q - Xavier: Okay, that's what I call a rule. It means something that we have to respect, otherwise it doesn't work.)
MB: Yes, but it is less rigorous than chess rules, etc. It's more of a method than a rule. But that's it, we agree. But I put things into perspective a little, it's less strict than what you mention about the movement of pawns in a given game, chess or queen or other. It's less strict than that, but it's comparable.
(Q - Xavier: Okay, thank you Michel.)
MB: When are we on the last two?
(Q - Xavier: Yes, in the last two, do we have rules to respect? That is to say things, we have to do that. Well, there are the review. We know that we are coming, blablabla. Do we have rules to respect? That is to say that we realize that certain things, like we have rules, that? , we can do that. We can't do that.)
MB: Give me an example of a rule.
(Q - Xavier: The best known, let's take for example the game of chess, we have pieces that move in such a way, in checkers the same, we have rules in all games, established rules, we will consider as in chess that they are established and we must respect these rules or not at all. This means that we do things a little as we want, we check if it works without knowing these. That is to say that the fact of saying, for example, for a lady, we know very well that a lady is not going to move from right to left. )
MB: I understand. I lay down the method rule as we talked about it earlier. So indeed, there is a method to capture. Afterwards, there is no other.
(Q - Xavier: Okay, that is to say that in any case, there is something to do and we have to do this and that, that, we don't do it and we have to do the right thing. That is to say, there is a trick and it only works with that.)
MB: There you go.
(Q - Xavier: Okay, that's what I call a rule. It means something that we have to respect, otherwise it doesn't work.)
MB: Yes, but it is less rigorous than chess rules, etc. It's more of a method than a rule. But that's it, we agree. But I put things into perspective a little, it's less strict than what you mention about the movement of pawns in a given game, chess or queen or other. It's less strict than that, but it's comparable.
(Q - Xavier: Okay, thank you Michel.)