(Q - Aladore: To come back to what you said to Roc, when you talked about us being more interested in the cause than the effect, were you talking about this famous deduction precisely
of the PER that we should have?)
MB: So, the cause, I understand your question, but that’s not the word I used. I used this method. It's a little different in cause. The method is the way of proceeding. It's not quite the same as the cause.
(Q - Aladore: And this is close to what we must deduct from our PER?)
MB: Let's say that if we want to find the trick, there is a method to follow and that this method is important.
(Q - Aladore: Ok, thank you.)
MB: I can't believe everything I can tell you. You should have found it already
(Q - Rigel: Hello Mr. Becker, this is Rigel. I have a question regarding the review. I wanted to know if ever, during the review, we notice one or more anomalies should we just notice them or should we correct them?)
MB: From my point of view, there are no anomalies to note, but there are certainly observations to be made.
MB: So, the cause, I understand your question, but that’s not the word I used. I used this method. It's a little different in cause. The method is the way of proceeding. It's not quite the same as the cause.
(Q - Aladore: And this is close to what we must deduct from our PER?)
MB: Let's say that if we want to find the trick, there is a method to follow and that this method is important.
(Q - Aladore: Ok, thank you.)
MB: I can't believe everything I can tell you. You should have found it already
(Q - Rigel: Hello Mr. Becker, this is Rigel. I have a question regarding the review. I wanted to know if ever, during the review, we notice one or more anomalies should we just notice them or should we correct them?)
MB: From my point of view, there are no anomalies to note, but there are certainly observations to be made.