(Q - CatsEyes: There is a question from Mimi. She says, good evening Michel, I have a final question. When you told us in voice, no pun in the hunt. Can
please specify if it was concerning the language of birds and/or all the word games of the French language as a whole Examples, charades, anagrams, rebuses, etc.)
MB: I saw her question, she wrote it. I saw it, I took a look. Earlier, I saw his question. The language of birds should be completely excluded. Max has never talked about bird language, so we don't even talk about it. The fact that there are rebuses, charades, notions of rebuses, charades, etc. in the riddles, I think everyone has understood it, obviously, so I don't think I have anything to do with it. add to that. It was solved differently for one or the other, or interpreted differently, but the mechanics of the puzzles were understood, so I'm not going to come back to them. There are indeed a certain number of charades or rebuses, well, let's call it what we want. Afterwards, beyond that, what should it be about? Apart from that, where, at what point, could we think there are puns or things like that?
Is Mimi there, right?
(Q - CatsEyes: No, she asked me, so I think she can't ask her question. We still have puns in hunting, for example, a knot , etc… That's it, that's typically, for me, it's part of the potential puns.)
MB: A knot? A knot, sorry? How ?
(Q - CatsEyes: A knot like a string knot, but which gives a knot, an “e”, or air for example.)
MB: No, that doesn’t exist. Apart from what is known today, I would say, about solving puzzles, there is no…, there is no need…, there is no point in looking any further.
MB: I saw her question, she wrote it. I saw it, I took a look. Earlier, I saw his question. The language of birds should be completely excluded. Max has never talked about bird language, so we don't even talk about it. The fact that there are rebuses, charades, notions of rebuses, charades, etc. in the riddles, I think everyone has understood it, obviously, so I don't think I have anything to do with it. add to that. It was solved differently for one or the other, or interpreted differently, but the mechanics of the puzzles were understood, so I'm not going to come back to them. There are indeed a certain number of charades or rebuses, well, let's call it what we want. Afterwards, beyond that, what should it be about? Apart from that, where, at what point, could we think there are puns or things like that?
Is Mimi there, right?
(Q - CatsEyes: No, she asked me, so I think she can't ask her question. We still have puns in hunting, for example, a knot , etc… That's it, that's typically, for me, it's part of the potential puns.)
MB: A knot? A knot, sorry? How ?
(Q - CatsEyes: A knot like a string knot, but which gives a knot, an “e”, or air for example.)
MB: No, that doesn’t exist. Apart from what is known today, I would say, about solving puzzles, there is no…, there is no need…, there is no point in looking any further.