(Q - Brybry: No, it's from Ash's walk-through. It's from Ash's walk-through. Because they don't stop in front and look them up and down.)
(Q - Sylvain: Exactly, it comes from Ash's review, where they had nothing on them.)
MB: Wait, wait, wait, PER, what does that mean?
(Q - Sylvain: Review.)
MB: Okay. And there you are talking about the sentries. Yes. Did we talk about Ash's sentinels? Have we even talked about Ash's sentinels once? No, but even since this famous review took place, we have never spoken, we have never made a comment on the sentries. No, we talked about the review. We didn't talk about the sentries.
(Q - Sylvain: Yes, but it's the sentries that we need to review.)
MB: Yes, but the sentinels exist somewhere, okay? Yeah. The problem is how you review them. Apparently, for many, that's it. OK ? I mean, when we shot this at the party, etc., we never talked about the sentries. We focused on the review. We wanted to talk and we talked about the review. And you're drawing conclusions about the sentinels.
(Q - Sylvain: It's a bit complicated because I wasn't at the party. We make do with what we have, it's not easy to have all the information. )
MB: You weren't at the party, did you see the video?
(Q - Sylvain: Yes, I saw a review.)
MB: Everyone was at the table. From where it was filmed, everyone saw the same thing as you. Nothing more, nothing less.
(Q - Sylvain: Yes, but what we saw was also the sentries. We didn't just see Ash.)
MB: Let's say he walked past the wall, it was a bit empty. So, we put three sentries, story
to put ourselves in context a little.
(Q - Sylvain: Because you said that the sentries played the role well too. So, I said to myself perhaps that we should think a little about that.)
MB: No, no, no. I think we shouldn't question everything. No, but it's really quite interesting that we can say these things to each other because... You don't have to re-examine everything every time. I consider myself to be an honest person, I know that this is not everyone's opinion, and God knows that some people enjoy it, but I consider myself to be an honest person. So in everything I told you, there is actually no confusion. There are times when I can say things that are a little cryptic because I don't want to reveal too much, but what I said, I said it, I stand by it and I don't change anything. Here we return to the start of the question. There you go.
Afterwards, we must consider that once we are on the ground, we are confronted with the last solution and we try to find the outcome that everyone dreams of, everything that comes to mind, not meaning, THE senses, everything that comes under the senses, must be taken into account. We are on the ground, we capture, we look, we try to get our idea, our synthesis with all these elements.
(Q - Sylvain: That was indeed my question because indeed, if we have nothing left, we can take it into account.)
MB: No, but we are far from having anything left. The essential remains.
(Q - Brybry: We, that's what we deduced. If Ash didn't stop in front, me first, we made deductions that as a result, he didn't look not, if there were things. Anyway, all these deductions, they actually come from there.)
MB: Hey Brybry, I understand that you flirt from time to time. Am I wrong?
(Q - Brybry: In my spare time perhaps.)
MB: Well, when you pass a pretty girl on the street, do you stop every time? [No]. Well, what if I meet you 10 meters away and I say to you, what is she like? Will you be able to tell me or not?
(Q - Belou: He'll tell you, she had a nice ass!)
MB: So he didn't look him in the eye, that's what I thought. No but seriously, seriously, you are jumping to conclusions. Passing by without stopping doesn't exclude many things.
(Q - Roc: Yes, but in Ash's walkthrough, and he was looking from head to toe and said “no, no, it's not head to toe , it’s in the eyes.”)
(Q - Brybry: That's what confused us, yes.)
MB: Well, you go to the internet, you type “review”, if you see a review where there is a officer, whoever it is, a politician, whoever you want, who is reviewing, who is stop and look at people from head to toe, you send me the video, okay?
(Q - Brybry: It's because we're too basic, Michel. We try not to be excessive.)
(Q - Roc: No, but me, in relation to Ash's review, I would like to intervene because there is a lack of fairness towards the sentinels because they were not not aligned and Ash, normally, in a review, you pass at the same distance from each of the sentries and there is one of the sentries who was much further away than the others. That's not fair. )
MB: It’s not fair in relation to what? The fact that he doesn't have good eyesight?? He didn't see…
(Q - Roc: It's because there are sentinels who were looked at more closely than the others.)
MB: In the game, we say that they are not aligned. You should know...
(Q - Roc: Yes, but the reviews are always at the same distance from each of the sentinels.)
MB: Oh well??
(Q - Roc: I think so. Besides, Patrick from “RoseNoire et Patrick” came to talk to us and he said that too. He said that the sentries often make a U and the officer passes and he makes the U at the same distance from each of the sentries.)
MB: Of course, but here, we are basing ourselves on the, quote, academic version of the review. We do a review adapted to the game. Roc, you are not that rigid, no pun intended.
(Q - Roc: It depends. At times, yes. Laughs.)
MB: In the spring, you seemed open to everyone on the Discord. That, I know. And the full moon too. Everyone knows about hot periods in Canada. We understand, but apart from that, you have to keep a certain open mind. You have to understand that we are speaking in a somewhat pictorial way, all the same, all that. We are not among the military either, it was perhaps a good example to have the opinion of a soldier, but we are still not among the military. I feel like someone is trying to push me to my limits.
(Q - Roc: No, but it's because there are several ways to do the review, then well, we try to eliminate tracks, because there are some too much, that's the problem. We'll keep looking.)
MB: You have to, because you know, the soldiers you question, there aren't many who have had high-profile stints at 300,000 euros. This gives better visual acuity and a certain tolerance in relation to the parameters.
You know what I mean. It's not quite the same though.
(Q - Roc: Ok, thank you.)
(Q - Sylvain: Exactly, it comes from Ash's review, where they had nothing on them.)
MB: Wait, wait, wait, PER, what does that mean?
(Q - Sylvain: Review.)
MB: Okay. And there you are talking about the sentries. Yes. Did we talk about Ash's sentinels? Have we even talked about Ash's sentinels once? No, but even since this famous review took place, we have never spoken, we have never made a comment on the sentries. No, we talked about the review. We didn't talk about the sentries.
(Q - Sylvain: Yes, but it's the sentries that we need to review.)
MB: Yes, but the sentinels exist somewhere, okay? Yeah. The problem is how you review them. Apparently, for many, that's it. OK ? I mean, when we shot this at the party, etc., we never talked about the sentries. We focused on the review. We wanted to talk and we talked about the review. And you're drawing conclusions about the sentinels.
(Q - Sylvain: It's a bit complicated because I wasn't at the party. We make do with what we have, it's not easy to have all the information. )
MB: You weren't at the party, did you see the video?
(Q - Sylvain: Yes, I saw a review.)
MB: Everyone was at the table. From where it was filmed, everyone saw the same thing as you. Nothing more, nothing less.
(Q - Sylvain: Yes, but what we saw was also the sentries. We didn't just see Ash.)
MB: Let's say he walked past the wall, it was a bit empty. So, we put three sentries, story
to put ourselves in context a little.
(Q - Sylvain: Because you said that the sentries played the role well too. So, I said to myself perhaps that we should think a little about that.)
MB: No, no, no. I think we shouldn't question everything. No, but it's really quite interesting that we can say these things to each other because... You don't have to re-examine everything every time. I consider myself to be an honest person, I know that this is not everyone's opinion, and God knows that some people enjoy it, but I consider myself to be an honest person. So in everything I told you, there is actually no confusion. There are times when I can say things that are a little cryptic because I don't want to reveal too much, but what I said, I said it, I stand by it and I don't change anything. Here we return to the start of the question. There you go.
Afterwards, we must consider that once we are on the ground, we are confronted with the last solution and we try to find the outcome that everyone dreams of, everything that comes to mind, not meaning, THE senses, everything that comes under the senses, must be taken into account. We are on the ground, we capture, we look, we try to get our idea, our synthesis with all these elements.
(Q - Sylvain: That was indeed my question because indeed, if we have nothing left, we can take it into account.)
MB: No, but we are far from having anything left. The essential remains.
(Q - Brybry: We, that's what we deduced. If Ash didn't stop in front, me first, we made deductions that as a result, he didn't look not, if there were things. Anyway, all these deductions, they actually come from there.)
MB: Hey Brybry, I understand that you flirt from time to time. Am I wrong?
(Q - Brybry: In my spare time perhaps.)
MB: Well, when you pass a pretty girl on the street, do you stop every time? [No]. Well, what if I meet you 10 meters away and I say to you, what is she like? Will you be able to tell me or not?
(Q - Belou: He'll tell you, she had a nice ass!)
MB: So he didn't look him in the eye, that's what I thought. No but seriously, seriously, you are jumping to conclusions. Passing by without stopping doesn't exclude many things.
(Q - Roc: Yes, but in Ash's walkthrough, and he was looking from head to toe and said “no, no, it's not head to toe , it’s in the eyes.”)
(Q - Brybry: That's what confused us, yes.)
MB: Well, you go to the internet, you type “review”, if you see a review where there is a officer, whoever it is, a politician, whoever you want, who is reviewing, who is stop and look at people from head to toe, you send me the video, okay?
(Q - Brybry: It's because we're too basic, Michel. We try not to be excessive.)
(Q - Roc: No, but me, in relation to Ash's review, I would like to intervene because there is a lack of fairness towards the sentinels because they were not not aligned and Ash, normally, in a review, you pass at the same distance from each of the sentries and there is one of the sentries who was much further away than the others. That's not fair. )
MB: It’s not fair in relation to what? The fact that he doesn't have good eyesight?? He didn't see…
(Q - Roc: It's because there are sentinels who were looked at more closely than the others.)
MB: In the game, we say that they are not aligned. You should know...
(Q - Roc: Yes, but the reviews are always at the same distance from each of the sentinels.)
MB: Oh well??
(Q - Roc: I think so. Besides, Patrick from “RoseNoire et Patrick” came to talk to us and he said that too. He said that the sentries often make a U and the officer passes and he makes the U at the same distance from each of the sentries.)
MB: Of course, but here, we are basing ourselves on the, quote, academic version of the review. We do a review adapted to the game. Roc, you are not that rigid, no pun intended.
(Q - Roc: It depends. At times, yes. Laughs.)
MB: In the spring, you seemed open to everyone on the Discord. That, I know. And the full moon too. Everyone knows about hot periods in Canada. We understand, but apart from that, you have to keep a certain open mind. You have to understand that we are speaking in a somewhat pictorial way, all the same, all that. We are not among the military either, it was perhaps a good example to have the opinion of a soldier, but we are still not among the military. I feel like someone is trying to push me to my limits.
(Q - Roc: No, but it's because there are several ways to do the review, then well, we try to eliminate tracks, because there are some too much, that's the problem. We'll keep looking.)
MB: You have to, because you know, the soldiers you question, there aren't many who have had high-profile stints at 300,000 euros. This gives better visual acuity and a certain tolerance in relation to the parameters.
You know what I mean. It's not quite the same though.
(Q - Roc: Ok, thank you.)