(Q - Catseyes: But for the example of the Saint-Martin terminal, it has four sides. Well, a review like Ash did, technically, we only look at one side
, but when we have a quadrilateral with potentially four faces that we can look at, not to mention that we have two other stones with potentially two other faces each, there you go, I understand Roc's question in this sense.)
MB: Yes, but I'm not going to succumb so easily to the charm of your beautiful eyes, Catseyes. This must not be an illusion. All sentinels, including these wonderful rocks found in the Fontainebleau region, have many faces. Sentinels such as these can interest us in the game, there is none that has only one face, that is obvious. They are all multifaceted, 4, 5, 6, whatever, depending on the volumes we are talking about or an infinity of faces, whatever. What we are talking about is a principle. In other words, we come back to something I wrote not very, very long ago. We must not confuse, focus on the results and forget the method. It's interesting. It deserves a minute of silence so I can catch my breath.
(Q - Nabil: Hello Michel, can you hear me? I just have one big question, are there by any chance other numbers to use than those present on the visual of the 650 ?)
MB: Do you realize that you just told me by chance? Hunting is not a game of chance, it is a game of sagacity. There's no hazard.
(Q - Nabil: Of course, of course, it's your way of speaking. But then…)
MB: There, I have to be careful with the way you speak, because otherwise I'll get trapped. So, you're telling me, are the numbers that appear on the visual of the 650 the only ones to take into account?
(Q - Nabil: Exactly. Yes, it's better put like that, it's true.)
MB: You see, it’s better posed. And what would your answer be?
(Q - Nabil: I would say, I'm not sure. I have a little doubt, but logic, if we go by the head, I would say yes. There is no There are no others, they're the only ones. But if we start to worry, we can potentially find others.)
(Q - Sylvain: Michel, let's go back to our logic from earlier. If we take the same logic as earlier, you remember that we talked about the sentinels, that Basically, in the puzzles, it was not a villain, but that it was the appearance of the character of Max Valentin that made him a villain. So, we came to the conclusion that basically, he was not a villain. He put three sentinels So, we use the three basic sentinels If we use the same logic for Nabil's question, what would we be tempted to answer?) /i>
(Q - Catseyes: The answer is no, we only use numbers, that's it.)
(Q - Sylvain: Would you be tempted to answer the same?)
MB: I answer the same, I answer that when the hunt was designed, each of the elements requested in the specifications, we will come back to a serious answer. You see Nabil, I haven't lost my bearings, don't worry. So, we come back to a serious question, each of the elements mentioned in the specifications, in particular this sequence of numbers, 71721075, damn grandpa, he knows them by heart, well this sequence of numbers actually has a precise role to play. This sequence of numbers has a specific role to play. It must play its role... This sequence of numbers therefore has a precise role to play and it must play its role in the context of the last two puzzles, that is to say after the change of gear and on the ground. This is my answer.
(Q - Catseyes: And in the book too?)
MB: How in the book too? What do you mean by that ?
(Q - Catseyes: Do numbers have a role to play in the last two puzzles?)
MB: So, of course, obviously, obviously, they have a major role to play. But the role of the figures as presented, I don't want to say defined or anything, but presented in the book, implied in 1993 and a fortiori in 1980, when the hunt was conceived or even a little before, implied a putting into perspective between the book and the field. Today, I confirm that the elements available to us thanks to the Internet allow us to put this into perspective from home.
MB: Yes, but I'm not going to succumb so easily to the charm of your beautiful eyes, Catseyes. This must not be an illusion. All sentinels, including these wonderful rocks found in the Fontainebleau region, have many faces. Sentinels such as these can interest us in the game, there is none that has only one face, that is obvious. They are all multifaceted, 4, 5, 6, whatever, depending on the volumes we are talking about or an infinity of faces, whatever. What we are talking about is a principle. In other words, we come back to something I wrote not very, very long ago. We must not confuse, focus on the results and forget the method. It's interesting. It deserves a minute of silence so I can catch my breath.
(Q - Nabil: Hello Michel, can you hear me? I just have one big question, are there by any chance other numbers to use than those present on the visual of the 650 ?)
MB: Do you realize that you just told me by chance? Hunting is not a game of chance, it is a game of sagacity. There's no hazard.
(Q - Nabil: Of course, of course, it's your way of speaking. But then…)
MB: There, I have to be careful with the way you speak, because otherwise I'll get trapped. So, you're telling me, are the numbers that appear on the visual of the 650 the only ones to take into account?
(Q - Nabil: Exactly. Yes, it's better put like that, it's true.)
MB: You see, it’s better posed. And what would your answer be?
(Q - Nabil: I would say, I'm not sure. I have a little doubt, but logic, if we go by the head, I would say yes. There is no There are no others, they're the only ones. But if we start to worry, we can potentially find others.)
(Q - Sylvain: Michel, let's go back to our logic from earlier. If we take the same logic as earlier, you remember that we talked about the sentinels, that Basically, in the puzzles, it was not a villain, but that it was the appearance of the character of Max Valentin that made him a villain. So, we came to the conclusion that basically, he was not a villain. He put three sentinels So, we use the three basic sentinels If we use the same logic for Nabil's question, what would we be tempted to answer?) /i>
(Q - Catseyes: The answer is no, we only use numbers, that's it.)
(Q - Sylvain: Would you be tempted to answer the same?)
MB: I answer the same, I answer that when the hunt was designed, each of the elements requested in the specifications, we will come back to a serious answer. You see Nabil, I haven't lost my bearings, don't worry. So, we come back to a serious question, each of the elements mentioned in the specifications, in particular this sequence of numbers, 71721075, damn grandpa, he knows them by heart, well this sequence of numbers actually has a precise role to play. This sequence of numbers has a specific role to play. It must play its role... This sequence of numbers therefore has a precise role to play and it must play its role in the context of the last two puzzles, that is to say after the change of gear and on the ground. This is my answer.
(Q - Catseyes: And in the book too?)
MB: How in the book too? What do you mean by that ?
(Q - Catseyes: Do numbers have a role to play in the last two puzzles?)
MB: So, of course, obviously, obviously, they have a major role to play. But the role of the figures as presented, I don't want to say defined or anything, but presented in the book, implied in 1993 and a fortiori in 1980, when the hunt was conceived or even a little before, implied a putting into perspective between the book and the field. Today, I confirm that the elements available to us thanks to the Internet allow us to put this into perspective from home.