(Q - Catseyes: I think it's because we actually ask ourselves too many questions. We ask ourselves too many questions. We don't take things as they come. There are
especially things that are too convoluted )
. (Q - Sylvain: Yes, but that is precisely linked to history. It is linked to history, yes.)
(Q - Magical: If I look the sentries straight in the eyes, would I see the end of the tunnel at the end?)
MB: I would be tempted to say yes, of course. That's the goal of the game, of course. THANKS.
(Q - Sylvain: If they have eyes.)
MB: It’s a way of speaking, if indeed they are sentinels. Do they have a uniform? Are they standing at attention? You have to think of all of this as being in the context of the game, obviously.
(Q - JB: I have a question, because if I do the pass in sight, at least what I think is a pass in sight in the sense of the game, and I get something thing, if I get something that's not very clear and I don't know what to do with it, does that mean I'm wrong or is it because there is something wrong? maybe a step behind in understanding before moving on to the pile-up? I don't know if my question is clear.)
MB: Yes, yes, yes, I understand the meaning of the question. If I see things that seem obscure to me, that I don't really understand, am I wrong or not? No, there may be a need for a moment, a time of understanding, it's not necessarily destabilizing, but anyway, it's in relation to... other examples, I would say, this n That's not what we need to find out. It's also not some indescribable language or I don't know what. These are things which, in this case, must be understood relatively quickly all the same. We may have a moment of doubt, but we must quickly reach a certain understanding.
. (Q - Sylvain: Yes, but that is precisely linked to history. It is linked to history, yes.)
(Q - Magical: If I look the sentries straight in the eyes, would I see the end of the tunnel at the end?)
MB: I would be tempted to say yes, of course. That's the goal of the game, of course. THANKS.
(Q - Sylvain: If they have eyes.)
MB: It’s a way of speaking, if indeed they are sentinels. Do they have a uniform? Are they standing at attention? You have to think of all of this as being in the context of the game, obviously.
(Q - JB: I have a question, because if I do the pass in sight, at least what I think is a pass in sight in the sense of the game, and I get something thing, if I get something that's not very clear and I don't know what to do with it, does that mean I'm wrong or is it because there is something wrong? maybe a step behind in understanding before moving on to the pile-up? I don't know if my question is clear.)
MB: Yes, yes, yes, I understand the meaning of the question. If I see things that seem obscure to me, that I don't really understand, am I wrong or not? No, there may be a need for a moment, a time of understanding, it's not necessarily destabilizing, but anyway, it's in relation to... other examples, I would say, this n That's not what we need to find out. It's also not some indescribable language or I don't know what. These are things which, in this case, must be understood relatively quickly all the same. We may have a moment of doubt, but we must quickly reach a certain understanding.