24/04/2024 - Vocal n° 68 - 00:42:30 :30: Possibility of finding the right pile with a wrong solution
(Q - Roc: Good evening everyone, good evening Michel.)
MB: Roc, Roc, Roc, I want you to invite me to Canada. I want you to find me an Airbnb, in Mirabel
(Q - Roc: In Mirabel?)
MB: Yes.
(Q - Roc: Ok. Mirabel is quiet. It's the suburbs, at 7 p.m., everyone is asleep.)
MB: I know, I know, at least I will be peaceful, I will be on vacation. I said to myself, wait, in Mirabel, near Roc's, I'll have to go there one day.
(Q - Roc: Yeah, but Mirabel, it's still almost an hour from here to there. In any case, well, Mirabel, OK, I'll look, then I'll talk to you about it again . I'm so surprised by Mirabel, phew.)
MB: I like it, I like destabilizing you from the start.
(Q - Roc: Well, there is something bothering me.
MB: that doesn’t surprise me…
(Q - Roc: You know that we, the researchers, have a lot, a lot of imagination. And if in the case where a researcher manages to imagine a great solution which is completely false or partially false, but it arrives at the same point as that of hunting. What happens in this case??)
MB: But I was going to tell you, respond to you like that spontaneously, once again, I'm careful about what I say, but to define the right thing, the right thing, I don't think there is has other possibilities than the good one. So afterwards, there are certain theories which make up paths, courses which mean that the pirates would have gone to Polytechnique, because it's not a joke.
Indeed, we can always imagine a whole thing where we arrive at the same point, but from the moment we arrive at that point, the only way to define it clearly, precisely with centimeter precision, is to good solution. Any other variation which would consist of, say, arriving there by circuitous routes will, in my opinion, never give exactly the same result.
It's so… it's improbable, I mean. That is to say, the way it would be transcribed, it would say, well there you go, I do this, this, this, this, this, and I arrive at a place. Yeah, okay, but it wouldn't necessarily match exactly, so in terms of a good solution, it wouldn't be the right solution to the puzzles. And so we would have, we will say that we would have a physical telescoping on the fact that if the person who has this theory digs there, he will find the countermark, yes it can happen, but we will have a problem at the level of the 'explanation that will be given.
That being said, afterward, we fall if it were to happen, that is to say if someone finds the same point through circuitous explanations, but still arrives at the same point, digs and takes out the countermark, it will be when even considering that this person can possibly be declared the winner if he digs up the countermark. If she submits the solution to me [Note Bioposis: in the validation system], I will say no, it's not good.
(Q - Roc: Ok, because you know we have a lot of imagination anyway, you have to see it with all the solutions…)
MB: Yes, it’s clear, to see it I see it, my head is like a pumpkin…,
MB: Roc, Roc, Roc, I want you to invite me to Canada. I want you to find me an Airbnb, in Mirabel
(Q - Roc: In Mirabel?)
MB: Yes.
(Q - Roc: Ok. Mirabel is quiet. It's the suburbs, at 7 p.m., everyone is asleep.)
MB: I know, I know, at least I will be peaceful, I will be on vacation. I said to myself, wait, in Mirabel, near Roc's, I'll have to go there one day.
(Q - Roc: Yeah, but Mirabel, it's still almost an hour from here to there. In any case, well, Mirabel, OK, I'll look, then I'll talk to you about it again . I'm so surprised by Mirabel, phew.)
MB: I like it, I like destabilizing you from the start.
(Q - Roc: Well, there is something bothering me.
MB: that doesn’t surprise me…
(Q - Roc: You know that we, the researchers, have a lot, a lot of imagination. And if in the case where a researcher manages to imagine a great solution which is completely false or partially false, but it arrives at the same point as that of hunting. What happens in this case??)
MB: But I was going to tell you, respond to you like that spontaneously, once again, I'm careful about what I say, but to define the right thing, the right thing, I don't think there is has other possibilities than the good one. So afterwards, there are certain theories which make up paths, courses which mean that the pirates would have gone to Polytechnique, because it's not a joke.
Indeed, we can always imagine a whole thing where we arrive at the same point, but from the moment we arrive at that point, the only way to define it clearly, precisely with centimeter precision, is to good solution. Any other variation which would consist of, say, arriving there by circuitous routes will, in my opinion, never give exactly the same result.
It's so… it's improbable, I mean. That is to say, the way it would be transcribed, it would say, well there you go, I do this, this, this, this, this, and I arrive at a place. Yeah, okay, but it wouldn't necessarily match exactly, so in terms of a good solution, it wouldn't be the right solution to the puzzles. And so we would have, we will say that we would have a physical telescoping on the fact that if the person who has this theory digs there, he will find the countermark, yes it can happen, but we will have a problem at the level of the 'explanation that will be given.
That being said, afterward, we fall if it were to happen, that is to say if someone finds the same point through circuitous explanations, but still arrives at the same point, digs and takes out the countermark, it will be when even considering that this person can possibly be declared the winner if he digs up the countermark. If she submits the solution to me [Note Bioposis: in the validation system], I will say no, it's not good.
(Q - Roc: Ok, because you know we have a lot of imagination anyway, you have to see it with all the solutions…)
MB: Yes, it’s clear, to see it I see it, my head is like a pumpkin…,