(Q - ??: I have another question about the last puzzles, the super solution, is it really something mathematical, cutting-edge, or something imaginary,
wacky, a bit, out of the ordinary?)
MB: So, there is nothing, so I try to be, to weigh my words before pronouncing them, I was going to say, there is nothing imaginary in the last solution, no, there there is nothing imaginary. The last solution is based on things that are not imaginary.)
Silence… there are still apneas occurring there!
(Q - ??: So the pile-up, it is necessarily determined with mathematical precision.)
MB: That’s exactly it. I will repeat what I said earlier because it is important that you understand it. For example, I read messages where I am told that it is impossible in the field to make a trace to within 1 cm, or to within 2 cm, or to within 10 cm, etc. That's not what interests me.
The solution gives a precise point to the nearest centimeter, which has this solution, even, which was perhaps my case, I don't know, but once on the ground, even if we plant of one centimeter, or even ten centimeters, given that we are looking for an object that still has a width of fifty centimeters, that we make a hole that is not quite shoehorned, so we go dig a little wider, we won't risk much.
It's one thing for there to be an inaccuracy in the on-site application. Now, the solution that we must find taken from the book, if I dare say, this one, is precise. And if it is good, it does not authorize, there is no variation. If it's the right solution, it gives exactly the right centimeter.
MB: So, there is nothing, so I try to be, to weigh my words before pronouncing them, I was going to say, there is nothing imaginary in the last solution, no, there there is nothing imaginary. The last solution is based on things that are not imaginary.)
Silence… there are still apneas occurring there!
(Q - ??: So the pile-up, it is necessarily determined with mathematical precision.)
MB: That’s exactly it. I will repeat what I said earlier because it is important that you understand it. For example, I read messages where I am told that it is impossible in the field to make a trace to within 1 cm, or to within 2 cm, or to within 10 cm, etc. That's not what interests me.
The solution gives a precise point to the nearest centimeter, which has this solution, even, which was perhaps my case, I don't know, but once on the ground, even if we plant of one centimeter, or even ten centimeters, given that we are looking for an object that still has a width of fifty centimeters, that we make a hole that is not quite shoehorned, so we go dig a little wider, we won't risk much.
It's one thing for there to be an inaccuracy in the on-site application. Now, the solution that we must find taken from the book, if I dare say, this one, is precise. And if it is good, it does not authorize, there is no variation. If it's the right solution, it gives exactly the right centimeter.