MB: But at the same time, I would say, we should not consider that the solution system is a substitute for detectors.
There are some who tend to bludgeon solutions a bit.
Besides, sometimes I wonder why, because sometimes I see a series of solutions coming from the same author and I say to myself, why doesn't this person wait for a first answer to post a second one?
And so on.
I think we still have to keep a cool head.
We are in a game that requires reflection.
You have to allow yourself these times of reflection which can sometimes be quite long, but you have to allow yourself them all the same.
We must not machine-gun solutions.
Anyway, I'm preaching against my parish, but frankly, there's no point throwing out solutions, solutions, solutions.
You have to take the time to think, to tell yourself where things could go wrong.
It's the most difficult actually.
It's playing devil's advocate.
It's saying to yourself, well, in everything I've built there, what could still not be good?
We always come back to that. What am I really sure of?
And what could still be bad? I see solutions where, for example, someone tells me, I'll take an example like that, there's nothing specific about it, but they tell me, I find this letter, so it evokes this. And there, at that moment, I say to myself, but why does this evoke this? What is the logic that does this? And I realize that I also have people in front of me who have built a small universe inside this game, who revolve within this universe. For them, there are evocations in each letter or each number or I don't know what, and there is nothing objective about it in fact.
If we put ourselves back in the context of the game, I say to myself, but why is he reasoning like that? So sometimes, I understand, I say to myself yes indeed, it's a bit far-fetched, but why not. And then sometimes, I say to myself no but it's really, it's a very personal logic on the part of the player.
We always come back to that. What am I really sure of?
And what could still be bad? I see solutions where, for example, someone tells me, I'll take an example like that, there's nothing specific about it, but they tell me, I find this letter, so it evokes this. And there, at that moment, I say to myself, but why does this evoke this? What is the logic that does this? And I realize that I also have people in front of me who have built a small universe inside this game, who revolve within this universe. For them, there are evocations in each letter or each number or I don't know what, and there is nothing objective about it in fact.
If we put ourselves back in the context of the game, I say to myself, but why is he reasoning like that? So sometimes, I understand, I say to myself yes indeed, it's a bit far-fetched, but why not. And then sometimes, I say to myself no but it's really, it's a very personal logic on the part of the player.