(Q - Nazca: Could I ask a quick question? I have to go later, please.)
MB: Yes, me too.
(Q - Nazca: Hello Michel, it's Nazca. Are you well?)
MB: Hello. Yes, very good, very good. You too?
(Q - Nazca: Yes, I'm fine, I'm fine. A little tired.)
MB: You have recovered from your past madness, from your complex and varied theories. That's what I was talking about.
(Q - Nazca: Yes, it's moving, it's moving a lot.)
MB: I understand well. Okay, so go ahead and ask your question, Nazca.
(Q - Nazca: There was a discussion yesterday on the mechanism of the super-solution, and Saïd played us a vocal extract where you said in essence that in the order, it was the whole period where there was a debate on the vocabulary, so what is the hair-pile, what did you call the hair-pile, the final spot, etc. There was. a great confusion from what I understood among the owls at that time, a dissonance of vocabulary between you and them And so, in those circumstances, in that context, you said, d'. first, we find the area, then, we find the sentries, then, there is something to do, then we find the cache, then, there is another thing to do, and there, we find the pile-pile So, given that the context was a vocabulary problem and that it was two years ago, I would like to know if this sequence is still current.
(Q - Skybears: Me, Michel, I just want to add something, as it's a debate between me, Zen and Saïd, it's because we were talking about the last landmark. He, he said that he could have a marker after the sentries, but in a way that we understood differently and he gave me this vocal, saying to me, there we are, we are reaching the sentries, the sentries are sending to the. hide and hide, we find the pile-pile So, it’s true that this vocal…)
(Q - Nazca: Apart from the discussions on last mark or not last mark, I would really like to know if it happens in two stages like that, because it could have a lot of implications in the reasoning .)
MB: Don't debate the question too much because I won't understand anything anymore. At the stage I am at today, I would say that for me, hiding and flipping are the same thing. I don't know why I listed both at the time, maybe because some people were trying to make some, to make a bit of a distinction between the two. In reality, hiding and flipping are the same. So the steps are indeed the ones you mentioned, and hide and seek, we can reduce them to a single step.
(Q - Nazca: Okay, we find the area, we find the sentries. There is something to do there.)
MB: And we find the cache or the pile-pile, the place where the owl is hidden. We find the owl.
(Q - Nazca: Can't you do something twice?)
MB: No.
(Q - Nazca: Have a nice day, goodbye.)
MB: Yes, me too.
(Q - Nazca: Hello Michel, it's Nazca. Are you well?)
MB: Hello. Yes, very good, very good. You too?
(Q - Nazca: Yes, I'm fine, I'm fine. A little tired.)
MB: You have recovered from your past madness, from your complex and varied theories. That's what I was talking about.
(Q - Nazca: Yes, it's moving, it's moving a lot.)
MB: I understand well. Okay, so go ahead and ask your question, Nazca.
(Q - Nazca: There was a discussion yesterday on the mechanism of the super-solution, and Saïd played us a vocal extract where you said in essence that in the order, it was the whole period where there was a debate on the vocabulary, so what is the hair-pile, what did you call the hair-pile, the final spot, etc. There was. a great confusion from what I understood among the owls at that time, a dissonance of vocabulary between you and them And so, in those circumstances, in that context, you said, d'. first, we find the area, then, we find the sentries, then, there is something to do, then we find the cache, then, there is another thing to do, and there, we find the pile-pile So, given that the context was a vocabulary problem and that it was two years ago, I would like to know if this sequence is still current.
(Q - Skybears: Me, Michel, I just want to add something, as it's a debate between me, Zen and Saïd, it's because we were talking about the last landmark. He, he said that he could have a marker after the sentries, but in a way that we understood differently and he gave me this vocal, saying to me, there we are, we are reaching the sentries, the sentries are sending to the. hide and hide, we find the pile-pile So, it’s true that this vocal…)
(Q - Nazca: Apart from the discussions on last mark or not last mark, I would really like to know if it happens in two stages like that, because it could have a lot of implications in the reasoning .)
MB: Don't debate the question too much because I won't understand anything anymore. At the stage I am at today, I would say that for me, hiding and flipping are the same thing. I don't know why I listed both at the time, maybe because some people were trying to make some, to make a bit of a distinction between the two. In reality, hiding and flipping are the same. So the steps are indeed the ones you mentioned, and hide and seek, we can reduce them to a single step.
(Q - Nazca: Okay, we find the area, we find the sentries. There is something to do there.)
MB: And we find the cache or the pile-pile, the place where the owl is hidden. We find the owl.
(Q - Nazca: Can't you do something twice?)
MB: No.
(Q - Nazca: Have a nice day, goodbye.)