(Q - ??: I wanted to follow up on the exogenous finding. You are speaking to us from the beginning of an expression, of course.
Before that, you told us about a second concept which also allowed us to understand how to use numbers, and you never talk about it. I was wondering if it's because it's too trivial and it would be difficult to understand with it, or on the contrary, it would be even easier to understand what needs to be done.)< /i>
MB: So, I'm a little confused because I don't remember that. I've spoken for a number of hours, I'm afraid, since I started playing again, and I don't really remember everything. If you have the source, I'm interested. What is the sentence I would have said. About this?
(Q - ??: I think it was Roc at the time. Who had asked a question. He said, are there at least two things that make it possible to have the trigger? And you said, yes, at least two things that allow you to have the trigger.)
MB: There are several things that obviously make it click.
(Q - ??: Does it complete the expression or not at all?)
MB: Expression is a parameter to consider, there are others. And it’s the synthesis of all that that allows us to find, quite simply. And so, to come back to it for a moment, what the entity has, I was going to say, understood, but let's in any case imagine rather than understood, is exactly the way in which we must approach the figures.
And on the other hand, what she did not understand and what others understood, were elements that I induced in Pierrette, and which were all captured by one or the other. Well, there aren't 150 either, but there are still a few. Everything was understood by some, not by the same person.
And as for the entity, I don't have the impression that it took anything from Pierrette that would have reinforced its first advance.
Before that, you told us about a second concept which also allowed us to understand how to use numbers, and you never talk about it. I was wondering if it's because it's too trivial and it would be difficult to understand with it, or on the contrary, it would be even easier to understand what needs to be done.)< /i>
MB: So, I'm a little confused because I don't remember that. I've spoken for a number of hours, I'm afraid, since I started playing again, and I don't really remember everything. If you have the source, I'm interested. What is the sentence I would have said. About this?
(Q - ??: I think it was Roc at the time. Who had asked a question. He said, are there at least two things that make it possible to have the trigger? And you said, yes, at least two things that allow you to have the trigger.)
MB: There are several things that obviously make it click.
(Q - ??: Does it complete the expression or not at all?)
MB: Expression is a parameter to consider, there are others. And it’s the synthesis of all that that allows us to find, quite simply. And so, to come back to it for a moment, what the entity has, I was going to say, understood, but let's in any case imagine rather than understood, is exactly the way in which we must approach the figures.
And on the other hand, what she did not understand and what others understood, were elements that I induced in Pierrette, and which were all captured by one or the other. Well, there aren't 150 either, but there are still a few. Everything was understood by some, not by the same person.
And as for the entity, I don't have the impression that it took anything from Pierrette that would have reinforced its first advance.