Moteur de recherche & Synthèse des "Midits" sur le jeu "Sur la trace de la Chouette d'Or ®"

<< Back

10/04/2024 - Vocal n° 67 - 00:08:40 :40:650 - Use of numbers - Only one possibility

(Q - ??: Mimi found her microphone.)

MB: So has Mimi found her microphone yet?

(Q - Mimi: Yes, hello Michel.)

MB: Hello Mimi. How are you ? Have you finished your tube of Xanax?

(Q - Mimi: No, not yet!)

MB: Ouch, ouch, ouch, what despair, what despair, but we absolutely must not despair. What I say is strictly a reflection of the truth. We have never been in such a small area with so much to find and so much capacity to do so.
So afterwards, the big debate, when we are confronted with invalidations, as is your case, is to ask ourselves the question, do I insist by looking for something where I am or am I- what I'm reconsidering my path to see if I'm really in the right place.
And I say again, I want to say it again because it went well, but it didn't make enough of an impression, I say again that when we are somewhere, when we think we have found the right solution, that means that we have, in a certain way, developed what I called a mechanism, in other words, a means, by being or by projecting ourselves, because we can do it from home, on site, to use the famous numbers that we talk about, when we arrive at the end of the game, if the use of these numbers leads to an infinity of solutions, possibilities, etc., it is because the mechanism is not good.
The right mechanism doesn't allow for that many possibilities. He doesn't allow any, I don't know, depending on the minds of one or the other, it could be a little more, a little less, but I said 4 or 5, that seems to me to be a maximum, yes. there are more than 4 or 5 possibilities using the same system, the same mechanism, the same form of reasoning, it is that most likely, it is not good. So either we find another method with the same numbers and in the same place, or we have to start saying, well, maybe that's not where it's going. Interesting, huh?
Wow, the silence!
I look a bit like Max 2, I can see that some people write that I'm having fun with it, that I'm filling my excavations, that I'm prolonging the pleasure, that I'm willingly cryptic, etc. I wrote yesterday that the sentries were going to remain unmoved, so here we go, I'm cryptic, I'm getting yelled at. And hey, that's a good word, it doesn't go any further, but I think it's okay, I feel like everyone can understand that. For the rest, I try to be precise, I try not to confuse you.
And I tell you again, the game today is in the context of a game that must be discovered in a relatively short period of time. I also say that some may very well have a breakthrough very soon, or it will take a little longer, but overall, through the exchanges that take place, good ideas are moving forward.
I see it in... I read without exception 10.316, 17, 18, I don't know how many solutions I received, I read them all and I see very clearly that in the right place or not in the right place, the reasoning is consistent, we are no longer in x-th degrees, completely convoluted things.
We are using reasoning that is entirely plausible and coherent. Well, for many, this is not the right place. For some, it's in the right place. So the owl will be found. It’s inevitable.
Not bad though!