Moteur de recherche & Synthèse des "Midits" sur le jeu "Sur la trace de la Chouette d'Or ®"

<< Back

10/04/2024 - Vocal n° 67 - 00:01:00 :00: Progress of the Owls - Restricted scope

(Q - ??: She doesn't want to talk, Mimi. In fact, we're having a little trouble between the journey we have to take. Between the Sentinels and the pile-up. That's the puzzle.)

MB: So it's funny because, I'll tell you, this morning, I did a very long video with English producers who don't understand everything and who asked me to explain to them a little bit about the atmosphere hunting, the tenants, the outings, a little bit of the history of hunting. So, in moments like that, I have to first be simple, because well, for people who don't know the story in depth, we can't go into too many details. You have to be a little concise and then underline the important points.
And when we came to talk about the community of owls, which, parenthetically, is still widespread, we can say it because I have elements today which allow me to see it, is truly widespread throughout around the world, it's quite astonishing. Well, I come to explain, in moments like that, when ultimately, after all these years of, I was going to say wandering, that's saying a lot, but hey, floating around the game. And after two and a half years of resuming the game, we arrive at a stage where you are finally in direct contact with the important elements of the game.
You finally have some material because we really pruned it, because I pointed out some inconsistencies. Well, there remains a parameter that is a little bit rigid for me, which is that every time there is a contradiction, that there is something that… “Yeah, but Michel, he is full of contradictions.”< br /> I have no contradiction, but I am talking about what was done by someone else and what happened before my intervention.
And there, yes, there are things that are contradictory, there are things that are mind-blowing, but honestly, today, I was going to say the perimeter, but don't see the clue there. It's a word like any other. But I was going to say the scope, the extent to which you are authorized in your research, so the scope, which is still the term that is best suited, is much more restricted.
So, we are, if we take up an old parallel that I mentioned one day of looking for treasure in a wreck, I would say that the wreck is located, we know where it is, but now we have to find the treasure , which is not necessarily right in it, which could have fallen a little further, which is perhaps in the sand, which is perhaps elsewhere. We still have a precise idea of ??the location of the wreck, and in any case, we have a much smaller area to explore, and now we have to go there.
So what's destabilizing, well, I'm not quoting anyone, but as I read a lot of messages, even if I no longer reply to them in PM, I see a lot of people giving up, getting desperate. Some who give up, always with a little tone like “you made a mess, I don’t believe it anymore, I’m leaving”. I always feel a little bit of responsibility, well maybe I'm doing too much, but I have the impression that's what it feels like. And in the end, the opposite should happen, because we can hope to find the owl now, much more than in the last 20 years.

(Q - ??: That’s true, we are aware of that.)

MB: I don't know if everyone is aware of that.

(Q - ??: Sometimes we get a little frustrated and so there you go, there are little things.)

MB: No but a little frustration, yes, I understand, but it shouldn't be frustration, I mean, I took away a nonos to gnaw from you that you had gotten used to and then I screwed up what this nonos because it was without a way out for you And today but really, there is a way out.

(Q - ??: We understood that well.)

MB: Well, that’s not bad. Indeed.