(Q - Noble Action: hello, I'm on the same page, I think it's the right time, on what you just said because when you used the word "I think" then
I wasn't there, I listened to it on YouTube, I still have the impression of having started the 520 well, but precisely, you implied that potentially the sentinels were not exactly the same things as the
""them"", ""e"", ""u"", ""x"" and so it bothers me a lot, because I have the impression that it's pretty much the same thing
, and so, well, that's usually I'm not really into scratching clues, but do you ultimately prefer to say well, it's more ambiguous, I prefer to remove the ""I think"" and I
don't put anything in its place and deal with it or do you confirm that it's two different things or do you deny it and say no, it's really the same things?)
MB: I understand, it disturbed me afterwards too, I'll tell you why, so it's very funny what you're asking me, and it's good that we come back to it, the question that was asked to me asked, you can listen to it again, it was do the "e"s, I was asked do the "e"s have a link, I don't know the rest of the question. The "e"s, I understood the letters "e". And in fact, I was asked the question is the "e"? They should have asked me is the "e" and they told me are the "e" I understood the letters "e". I said, look, I don't think so.
(Q - Noble Action: yes, yes, okay, that suits me! I'm not asking for more!)
MB: I assure you that it's true, I'm not doing a spin, I thought about it afterwards, because I saw a few messages exchanged in writing where it was put back into question, and I said to myself ok now I understand why there was the misunderstanding. The question, you will listen to it again, you will see, did the “e”s I understand the “e”s?
(Q - Noble Action: no, but there you go, and then I'm not asking you the question about "them", "e", "u"", " "x"...)
MB: well obviously not...
(Q - Noble Action: because it echoes a little more logically in fact what I think, because ultimately with the ""e"" well I see, whereas with the " "them"...)
MB: yes because..., but there you go, but I thought about the "e" of eternity, the accents, not the accents, the "e"", I said to myself I'm dealing with people who go through every detail, the letters, the things, well the "e"s I said say no I don't think that the "e"s..., while telling myself perhaps that there is still..., that they still have a link somewhere which is useful or not, but I am not aware of it..., in terms of solutions the ""e"" do not have no..., do not appear, so I said to myself no I don't think so, that was the meaning of my answer. And that's the reason for "I don't think so".
(Q - Exalastro: hello Michel, he's the one who asked you the question about the (z)""them"" so, let's say...)
MB: ah here are the (z)""them""...
(Q - Exalastro: so I ask the question again, do the (z)""them"" of the 520 have a link with the sentinels of the 650?)
MB: the “them” or the “e”?
(Q - Exalastro: the ""e"" ""u"" ""x"".)
MB: no, but I'm not answering, I told you that last time.
MB: I understand, it disturbed me afterwards too, I'll tell you why, so it's very funny what you're asking me, and it's good that we come back to it, the question that was asked to me asked, you can listen to it again, it was do the "e"s, I was asked do the "e"s have a link, I don't know the rest of the question. The "e"s, I understood the letters "e". And in fact, I was asked the question is the "e"? They should have asked me is the "e" and they told me are the "e" I understood the letters "e". I said, look, I don't think so.
(Q - Noble Action: yes, yes, okay, that suits me! I'm not asking for more!)
MB: I assure you that it's true, I'm not doing a spin, I thought about it afterwards, because I saw a few messages exchanged in writing where it was put back into question, and I said to myself ok now I understand why there was the misunderstanding. The question, you will listen to it again, you will see, did the “e”s I understand the “e”s?
(Q - Noble Action: no, but there you go, and then I'm not asking you the question about "them", "e", "u"", " "x"...)
MB: well obviously not...
(Q - Noble Action: because it echoes a little more logically in fact what I think, because ultimately with the ""e"" well I see, whereas with the " "them"...)
MB: yes because..., but there you go, but I thought about the "e" of eternity, the accents, not the accents, the "e"", I said to myself I'm dealing with people who go through every detail, the letters, the things, well the "e"s I said say no I don't think that the "e"s..., while telling myself perhaps that there is still..., that they still have a link somewhere which is useful or not, but I am not aware of it..., in terms of solutions the ""e"" do not have no..., do not appear, so I said to myself no I don't think so, that was the meaning of my answer. And that's the reason for "I don't think so".
(Q - Exalastro: hello Michel, he's the one who asked you the question about the (z)""them"" so, let's say...)
MB: ah here are the (z)""them""...
(Q - Exalastro: so I ask the question again, do the (z)""them"" of the 520 have a link with the sentinels of the 650?)
MB: the “them” or the “e”?
(Q - Exalastro: the ""e"" ""u"" ""x"".)
MB: no, but I'm not answering, I told you that last time.