(Q - ??: Michel, excuse me for disturbing you, there is Yekoo who has been trying to ask a question since earlier, I just saw in the chat. Is it
that I can pose for him? Because apparently he's been wanting to pose for a while?)
(Q - ??: Yeah so, he says “How can the numbers only be partially understood by the people who follow the entity if all the numbers are used the same way?)
MB: This is already a question that is based on an “if”. If all the numbers are used in the same way, then I don't even know what that means.
(Q - There is no if eh, maybe it was me who added it while reading… “How the figures can only be partially understood by the people who follow the 'entity if all digits are used the same way?')
MB: But I don't know what..., so the way the numbers are used in quotation marks, some want to make it a decryption tool, some want to deduce a sentence from it. I have spoken on the subject, I will say no more. I want to repeat myself, numbers remain numbers. I think it can.
(Q - ??: Excuse me for cutting you off, Michel, but it can also give a postal code, for example…)
MB: numbers are still numbers, you do what you want with them, but numbers are still numbers.
(Q - ??: Numbers give other numbers?)
MB: You do what you want, that means that there is no notion, strictly speaking, of decryption there since the numbers remain numbers. When we talk about decryption, that means that we transpose, we try to translate elements which may be mixed numbers and other things, et cetera. We try to translate that clearly, so rather in sentences. There, in this case, the numbers remain numbers. You have numbers.
(Q - ??: Yeah so, he says “How can the numbers only be partially understood by the people who follow the entity if all the numbers are used the same way?)
MB: This is already a question that is based on an “if”. If all the numbers are used in the same way, then I don't even know what that means.
(Q - There is no if eh, maybe it was me who added it while reading… “How the figures can only be partially understood by the people who follow the 'entity if all digits are used the same way?')
MB: But I don't know what..., so the way the numbers are used in quotation marks, some want to make it a decryption tool, some want to deduce a sentence from it. I have spoken on the subject, I will say no more. I want to repeat myself, numbers remain numbers. I think it can.
(Q - ??: Excuse me for cutting you off, Michel, but it can also give a postal code, for example…)
MB: numbers are still numbers, you do what you want with them, but numbers are still numbers.
(Q - ??: Numbers give other numbers?)
MB: You do what you want, that means that there is no notion, strictly speaking, of decryption there since the numbers remain numbers. When we talk about decryption, that means that we transpose, we try to translate elements which may be mixed numbers and other things, et cetera. We try to translate that clearly, so rather in sentences. There, in this case, the numbers remain numbers. You have numbers.