(Q - Aladore: So I have a little one. You spoke to us several times about this famous sieve which could possibly help us to identify the interesting thing(s) to remember to finish evolving in
the game. My question is almost simple, it is, does the expression have a link with well, with this sieve precisely, is it the sieve which makes it possible to find the
expression or is it the expression that allows you to sift through it in fact?)
MB: The sieve, so we're talking about a sieve there, eh? We are talking about separating the finest particles from the larger ones and in any case eliminating the larger ones to refine the result. In reality, well, I'm making a bit of a play on words, but it's a very realistic image, you're peppering me with questions. So in this case right now, I'm the sieve. And as I give you the answers, we refine, we refine, we refine.
So the idea is to eliminate the big things, the big stones, fine sand if we want to be more precise. So yeah, there are big rocks, in all that, there are big tricks, big tricks, big things that we have nothing to do with, that can't bring us anything, it should be avoided. Like what has just been mentioned with the famous eighty, that is. It's a big stone, you shouldn't take that into account, you have to sift through it, you have to eliminate all that stuff, there's none of that.
(Q - Aladore: So we can sift this without expression, then just with our head?)
MB: Ah yes yes, absolutely, eh.
(Q - ??: Can we take the example of the spiral and say that we sift the spiral. The 4 centers, do they remain in the sieve then?)
MB: Do we trace it, do we find it and what else? No, there, frankly…, there we come across things. You're trying…, well maybe not trying to trap me, but I have to be scrutinized.
(Q - RD62: No, plus you've already said it, the 4 centers, we don't care a bit, it was literature, so I took the example of saying that , it passes.=
MB: It’s not literature for everyone. I did the job around the puzzles. You mustn't try to get more out of me. I did the job.
At the moment, I'm doing the job, I'm trying to do the job around the notion of comprehension, vocabulary, meaning of words, et cetera. I always maintain it and again, there is no play on words in the hunt, that's why..., I have nothing against him, I find that he is a very intelligent and very fine boy . I talk about Isidore, but when I hear about the language of birds, I say to myself, it's for me, it's a hopeless case. Max Valentin, he never spoke the language of birds Max Valentin, it was not at all his scope, and when he did..., when he used..., he published his book, the walls laugh, et cetera, with puns, stuff, there's not a single one that's his. He compiled stuff, but he never practiced it in, at least I'm talking at the level of the golden owl, I don't know the hunts that came afterwards. Afterwards, he reused almost all the ideas given to him by the owls, that's how it worked and he had them put to music by Phil d'Euck, by his designer, but, but that's all . We have to stop all this, we have to stop, we have to stop, we have to get back to basics.
MB: The sieve, so we're talking about a sieve there, eh? We are talking about separating the finest particles from the larger ones and in any case eliminating the larger ones to refine the result. In reality, well, I'm making a bit of a play on words, but it's a very realistic image, you're peppering me with questions. So in this case right now, I'm the sieve. And as I give you the answers, we refine, we refine, we refine.
So the idea is to eliminate the big things, the big stones, fine sand if we want to be more precise. So yeah, there are big rocks, in all that, there are big tricks, big tricks, big things that we have nothing to do with, that can't bring us anything, it should be avoided. Like what has just been mentioned with the famous eighty, that is. It's a big stone, you shouldn't take that into account, you have to sift through it, you have to eliminate all that stuff, there's none of that.
(Q - Aladore: So we can sift this without expression, then just with our head?)
MB: Ah yes yes, absolutely, eh.
(Q - ??: Can we take the example of the spiral and say that we sift the spiral. The 4 centers, do they remain in the sieve then?)
MB: Do we trace it, do we find it and what else? No, there, frankly…, there we come across things. You're trying…, well maybe not trying to trap me, but I have to be scrutinized.
(Q - RD62: No, plus you've already said it, the 4 centers, we don't care a bit, it was literature, so I took the example of saying that , it passes.=
MB: It’s not literature for everyone. I did the job around the puzzles. You mustn't try to get more out of me. I did the job.
At the moment, I'm doing the job, I'm trying to do the job around the notion of comprehension, vocabulary, meaning of words, et cetera. I always maintain it and again, there is no play on words in the hunt, that's why..., I have nothing against him, I find that he is a very intelligent and very fine boy . I talk about Isidore, but when I hear about the language of birds, I say to myself, it's for me, it's a hopeless case. Max Valentin, he never spoke the language of birds Max Valentin, it was not at all his scope, and when he did..., when he used..., he published his book, the walls laugh, et cetera, with puns, stuff, there's not a single one that's his. He compiled stuff, but he never practiced it in, at least I'm talking at the level of the golden owl, I don't know the hunts that came afterwards. Afterwards, he reused almost all the ideas given to him by the owls, that's how it worked and he had them put to music by Phil d'Euck, by his designer, but, but that's all . We have to stop all this, we have to stop, we have to stop, we have to get back to basics.