(Q - ???: And on the other hand the Additional Indications, do you include them in the madits or are they 2 totally different things?)
MB: Well, for what I know about Additional Indications, because he produced a certain number of them, some that I don't know, if that's the case, for what I know about them, for what I know about the genesis Additional Indications, that is to say the first ones which were made, I know for certain that everything which was done within the framework of the first editor, that is to say at the beginning, is - in particular, I have often spoken about it, the parallel or in any case the interference, more precisely with the Tour de France, that was done carefully. And here I say that there is no need to discuss that, we can take it as being an effectively complementary and additional element. For what ? Because the fact that the Tour de France is cut one line, two lines, thing, since that was the story, it's new, it's not a repeat, it doesn't paraphrase an enigma.
While all the additional pseudo-indications that were, or rather pseudo-indications, that were subsequently provided, I said it very clearly because I attended the meetings, it was done at the request of the editor-in-chief from L'Express, Du Figaro, from whatever, it was the bargaining chip to have a number of pages. It was the discussion, I attended the discussions. So it was good OK, we're giving you 3 issues by giving you so many pages, you provide us with additional information. We do it like this, we do it like that, OK. So it was bargaining chip. And these additional indications which were made for the newspapers are only paraphrases of the enigmas. They do not give players additional ways to find. She explains things to him in a slightly different way. Which I call paraphrasing. So it's not extra.
It's like I do sometimes, when I'm asked the same question several times, I answer using different examples or that's it. But it doesn't go further than that. While the Tour de France, yes, it is additional because it allows us to create, if we recreate ourselves, the exact route and we have features provided that the features are good, but there yes, we can deduce something or a confirmation. But it doesn't go much further than that. There's not much point in all that. To finish on the subject of additional information. What I have given you for 2 years is additional, complementary information, whatever you want, which is much more important.
MB: Well, for what I know about Additional Indications, because he produced a certain number of them, some that I don't know, if that's the case, for what I know about them, for what I know about the genesis Additional Indications, that is to say the first ones which were made, I know for certain that everything which was done within the framework of the first editor, that is to say at the beginning, is - in particular, I have often spoken about it, the parallel or in any case the interference, more precisely with the Tour de France, that was done carefully. And here I say that there is no need to discuss that, we can take it as being an effectively complementary and additional element. For what ? Because the fact that the Tour de France is cut one line, two lines, thing, since that was the story, it's new, it's not a repeat, it doesn't paraphrase an enigma.
While all the additional pseudo-indications that were, or rather pseudo-indications, that were subsequently provided, I said it very clearly because I attended the meetings, it was done at the request of the editor-in-chief from L'Express, Du Figaro, from whatever, it was the bargaining chip to have a number of pages. It was the discussion, I attended the discussions. So it was good OK, we're giving you 3 issues by giving you so many pages, you provide us with additional information. We do it like this, we do it like that, OK. So it was bargaining chip. And these additional indications which were made for the newspapers are only paraphrases of the enigmas. They do not give players additional ways to find. She explains things to him in a slightly different way. Which I call paraphrasing. So it's not extra.
It's like I do sometimes, when I'm asked the same question several times, I answer using different examples or that's it. But it doesn't go further than that. While the Tour de France, yes, it is additional because it allows us to create, if we recreate ourselves, the exact route and we have features provided that the features are good, but there yes, we can deduce something or a confirmation. But it doesn't go much further than that. There's not much point in all that. To finish on the subject of additional information. What I have given you for 2 years is additional, complementary information, whatever you want, which is much more important.