(Q - Brybry: Yeah, of course, but that's the empty holes too. It made us humble, it broke us in our... Finally, there is a certain self-confidence
who, by dint of making discoveries, little by little, destroys himself Finally, that's why an Aladore than anyone, even a Nabil, is sometimes very fragile in certain interpretations.
of what has been said. We see them all, we don't see them all, so you see. So it's definitely going to happen a little bit here and there.)
/i>
MB: So, but that’s it, it’s still… But you’re calling on something else there. You appeal to this old reflex of including the madits in the debates directly or indirectly. I never spoke, I never mentioned seeing all the sentries or not all the sentries. I never talked about being able to touch them or not touch them. This is all Max Valentin nonsense. It came from Max Valentin's minitel exchanges. These are questions that are not useful to ask. That's what I'm trying to say. If we start to ask ourselves: do we see all the sentries? OK. Can we touch them? Okay okay. Will this help you find them? No. Well no.
It won't give any information on the journey. But what you need to do is take the right route to get to the right place. Once there, there's a good chance that... we won't need to ask 150,000 questions about the sentinels. But the habit has become of sowing doubt precisely. This is the technique of madits. It’s: I make the pleasure last, I give you a little layer and with that you go for a ride again. I don't care if we see them all. And I answer in a vague way because I know very well that I am being questioned. In fact, they are trying to make me validate or invalidate a madit. In a direct or indirect way.
And today, I insist very heavily on the fact that madits are hyper toxic. Some say there are a few that are wrong, but most of them are right, et cetera. No, we can't even say that, we can't say that. I said one day, and this is an example that I find extremely relevant to this, when we detect a bacteria in a product, we remove the entire production from the shelves, we do not try to find out in which product it is contained. has bacteria and in which there are none. They say that all this production releases, there is a risk.
If we are not able to do that, we maintain the risk. If we are not able to say at a given moment, well OK, we understood, there was a lot of vagueness ultimately induced by the curses, there were certain false things, I know that there is a debate over whether I said there were fake ones or not fake ones. Yes, there are fake ones. So that means, and I also think that they were not necessarily written by Max Valentin himself, but there are some that are false. I don't want to get involved in this. I try to have a statement that is sanitized in relation to the curses, so I'm not interested in talking, in starting again with notions of: we see them all, we don't see them all, explain to me what does that bring you?
(Q - Brybry: Just to finish with that, we don't try. On the other hand, even if we 100% agree with you, it's of no interest to know if we see them all or not. We don't even have the idea of ??validating or invalidating them, we don't even study them. It's far behind us.)
.
MB: But I know. You said earlier: there are things that I do unconsciously. The curse is in the subconscious of most players. New players say: I don't take madits into account, but I read them from time to time. I see them passing by, so if I see them passing by, I read them. If I read one, I'll watch it. I'm going to read 2 or 3. And then, that's it, it's over. I had my little sting, I'm contaminated. The problem is there, the problem is that we have to admit, that's why I always talk about the personality in quotation marks of Max Valentin who is a virtual character, that's why I don't mix it with Régis Hauser, because it's really two very different areas, Mister Hyde and Doctor Jekyll, that's right. There is someone who was a real person, whom I did not know intimately and about whom I will be careful not to speak, on whom I will not pass judgment. There is a virtual character who turned out to be toxic in the game and took on a mythical dimension. So it is part of the game today and it has a very brilliant side, but at the same time very toxic. He's the villain of the game. If we don't know how to avoid him we fall into the trap and I try to stay out of that. I try to discuss constructive points.
MB: So, but that’s it, it’s still… But you’re calling on something else there. You appeal to this old reflex of including the madits in the debates directly or indirectly. I never spoke, I never mentioned seeing all the sentries or not all the sentries. I never talked about being able to touch them or not touch them. This is all Max Valentin nonsense. It came from Max Valentin's minitel exchanges. These are questions that are not useful to ask. That's what I'm trying to say. If we start to ask ourselves: do we see all the sentries? OK. Can we touch them? Okay okay. Will this help you find them? No. Well no.
It won't give any information on the journey. But what you need to do is take the right route to get to the right place. Once there, there's a good chance that... we won't need to ask 150,000 questions about the sentinels. But the habit has become of sowing doubt precisely. This is the technique of madits. It’s: I make the pleasure last, I give you a little layer and with that you go for a ride again. I don't care if we see them all. And I answer in a vague way because I know very well that I am being questioned. In fact, they are trying to make me validate or invalidate a madit. In a direct or indirect way.
And today, I insist very heavily on the fact that madits are hyper toxic. Some say there are a few that are wrong, but most of them are right, et cetera. No, we can't even say that, we can't say that. I said one day, and this is an example that I find extremely relevant to this, when we detect a bacteria in a product, we remove the entire production from the shelves, we do not try to find out in which product it is contained. has bacteria and in which there are none. They say that all this production releases, there is a risk.
If we are not able to do that, we maintain the risk. If we are not able to say at a given moment, well OK, we understood, there was a lot of vagueness ultimately induced by the curses, there were certain false things, I know that there is a debate over whether I said there were fake ones or not fake ones. Yes, there are fake ones. So that means, and I also think that they were not necessarily written by Max Valentin himself, but there are some that are false. I don't want to get involved in this. I try to have a statement that is sanitized in relation to the curses, so I'm not interested in talking, in starting again with notions of: we see them all, we don't see them all, explain to me what does that bring you?
(Q - Brybry: Just to finish with that, we don't try. On the other hand, even if we 100% agree with you, it's of no interest to know if we see them all or not. We don't even have the idea of ??validating or invalidating them, we don't even study them. It's far behind us.)
.
MB: But I know. You said earlier: there are things that I do unconsciously. The curse is in the subconscious of most players. New players say: I don't take madits into account, but I read them from time to time. I see them passing by, so if I see them passing by, I read them. If I read one, I'll watch it. I'm going to read 2 or 3. And then, that's it, it's over. I had my little sting, I'm contaminated. The problem is there, the problem is that we have to admit, that's why I always talk about the personality in quotation marks of Max Valentin who is a virtual character, that's why I don't mix it with Régis Hauser, because it's really two very different areas, Mister Hyde and Doctor Jekyll, that's right. There is someone who was a real person, whom I did not know intimately and about whom I will be careful not to speak, on whom I will not pass judgment. There is a virtual character who turned out to be toxic in the game and took on a mythical dimension. So it is part of the game today and it has a very brilliant side, but at the same time very toxic. He's the villain of the game. If we don't know how to avoid him we fall into the trap and I try to stay out of that. I try to discuss constructive points.