(Q - Syn: I was in bed. I wasn't really sleeping. Well, I have a little solution that came to mind, I said, come on, I'll do it
put it into practice, to send it to you, as usual and then I connect and I see Michel… You were talking about the arc, it's a very good example.).
MB: Yeah, that's a very good example, the bow in fact, but yes, I mean that I measure perfectly on my side, I measure perfectly what is happening in this hunt, everyone assumes that I don't understand everything, I don't have all the elements, I only have part of the solutions. When I hear Isidore, I shudder, but I can no longer do anything for Isidore, he is incurable..."yes, but Michel, he understood until then, but afterward, he didn't understand and then he didn't didn't quite have everything, and then Max added this and then something else”, that's all that, that's what ruins you.
I understood everything, I have all the very detailed solutions. And the detail doesn't take up a lot of space, extremely detailed. I have solutions which are those of the owl and not of Father Méhus's egg, as Isidore claims. So I have the right solutions which, I confirm, lead to the same place as the puzzles planned for Father Méhus' egg led. It's the same thing with words that have changed a little, with things that have changed a little, but what loses practically all the owls today is really this problem of vocabulary, of understanding...
MB: Yeah, that's a very good example, the bow in fact, but yes, I mean that I measure perfectly on my side, I measure perfectly what is happening in this hunt, everyone assumes that I don't understand everything, I don't have all the elements, I only have part of the solutions. When I hear Isidore, I shudder, but I can no longer do anything for Isidore, he is incurable..."yes, but Michel, he understood until then, but afterward, he didn't understand and then he didn't didn't quite have everything, and then Max added this and then something else”, that's all that, that's what ruins you.
I understood everything, I have all the very detailed solutions. And the detail doesn't take up a lot of space, extremely detailed. I have solutions which are those of the owl and not of Father Méhus's egg, as Isidore claims. So I have the right solutions which, I confirm, lead to the same place as the puzzles planned for Father Méhus' egg led. It's the same thing with words that have changed a little, with things that have changed a little, but what loses practically all the owls today is really this problem of vocabulary, of understanding...