(Q - Exalastro: And for the uniformity of a review, I think back to the game of 7 errors. That's a bit like the idea, it's to
say, what's wrong with this story?)
MB: It's funny there, because things that I said ultimately bring things to the surface when you remember expressions, things like that, you can completely compare with the notion of reflex . It comes to mind, you don't necessarily need to listen again, reread or anything. You recorded things and there it is useful to you, it comes to mind, Oh yeah, TAC, that's it...
(Q - Xavier: For the best example, it's as if for example I told you, I'm not asking for confirmation, you say that the measurement, we're going to say to ourselves that the random measurement makes 0.33, if at the end, we need the measurement, the reflex, it will be 0.33 for example.)
MB: For example.
(Q - Mupsaï: For the review, that would mean that there is a norm all the same, which we should find, and therefore we must be able to identify this norm in quotation marks to be able to...)
MB: That's pure Mupsai. No but Mupsaï, I'm serious here, we have the choice since we're talking about review between reviewing or defining how you said?
(Q - Mupsai: Ben goes over it, it's that soldiers obey a certain standard,
MB: Ah the norm, the norm…
(Q - Mupsai: The standard, yes, that is to say what you call dress, clean shaven and company, it is the standard. If we do not respect the standard, we were made to stand out…)
MB: Yes, but why is the standard interesting? These are not real sentinels we are talking about.
(Q - Mupsai: Yes, I hear correctly.)
MB: So they are not subject to this standard. In this case, the expression we are talking about for the moment is to review, the fact of being interested in the standard which may be behind it, in my opinion, this is a mental fatigue useless.
MB: It's funny there, because things that I said ultimately bring things to the surface when you remember expressions, things like that, you can completely compare with the notion of reflex . It comes to mind, you don't necessarily need to listen again, reread or anything. You recorded things and there it is useful to you, it comes to mind, Oh yeah, TAC, that's it...
(Q - Xavier: For the best example, it's as if for example I told you, I'm not asking for confirmation, you say that the measurement, we're going to say to ourselves that the random measurement makes 0.33, if at the end, we need the measurement, the reflex, it will be 0.33 for example.)
MB: For example.
(Q - Mupsaï: For the review, that would mean that there is a norm all the same, which we should find, and therefore we must be able to identify this norm in quotation marks to be able to...)
MB: That's pure Mupsai. No but Mupsaï, I'm serious here, we have the choice since we're talking about review between reviewing or defining how you said?
(Q - Mupsai: Ben goes over it, it's that soldiers obey a certain standard,
MB: Ah the norm, the norm…
(Q - Mupsai: The standard, yes, that is to say what you call dress, clean shaven and company, it is the standard. If we do not respect the standard, we were made to stand out…)
MB: Yes, but why is the standard interesting? These are not real sentinels we are talking about.
(Q - Mupsai: Yes, I hear correctly.)
MB: So they are not subject to this standard. In this case, the expression we are talking about for the moment is to review, the fact of being interested in the standard which may be behind it, in my opinion, this is a mental fatigue useless.