(Q - Saïdparis: Michel, if I gave you an example of a review, even if it is very precise, I am absolutely not asking you to react on the elements which make up this example, but on
the general idea at the end Let's say I want to make it very simple, that is to say that I arrive in this puzzle with a visual in my possession. Now, I find elements of this visual by reviewing.
, by being zealous, that is to say by being picky, I find elements that I have in my visual but which are not correct compared to my visual, would that be enough to justify a passing result
in review? The fact of having observed them, of having noticed that what I have is not good, that I must correct it.)
MB: Well, it's a possibility, but something interesting seems to me there, you said zealous, you used the adjective zealous. There is another example, I talked about the lawyer earlier, but when we talk about people who go on work-to-rule strike, you agree that it has nothing to do with the stagecoach strike.
(Q - Xavier: Why are people on stagecoach strike?)
MB: No, but there are people who are on work-to-rule strike, we never talked about diligence in the work-to-rule strike, so that means that diligence is not exactly the same thing.
(Q - Saïdparis: But in this example, we could say that I did a review and that I drew a result, would that possibly be enough?)< /u>
MB: It’s a very honorable version of a review. Why not.
(Q - Saïdparis: Okay, it wouldn't necessarily be something very complicated, but something that can jump out at us, and simply observe.)
MB: Why not.
(Q - Exalastro: But we can say, I look a little bit, I look at one soldier at a time, I don't necessarily see the rest, for example, I'm focused on..., I look at one, then I look at the next. There is this notion of deducing one after the other.)
MB: well you have to look at them all, you have to go through them, review them… And it’s one after the other, yes indeed, but…
(Q - Exalastro: isn't that a deduction? OK)
MB: No. [Note Bioposis: his tone is strange…]
(Q - Roc: And your review, you were naked, you said. You told us that in the 2:00 p.m. vocal…
MB: It’s true, they’re not sad memories from that time. Oh yeah, that wasn't a joke.
(Q - Roc: But why do a naked review? I don't understand, it was a joke you made, right?
MB: It was also jokes, but normally when you were drafted into the army, it was everyone naked, right? And then we went to get his clothes and…
(Q - Xavier: Are you sure it was during military service? That you weren't in a naturist camp?
(Q - Xavier: No, I said it's still quite rare that in the army, we find everyone naked, their cock showing.)< /u>
MB: Yeah, but we're not the same age huh. But no, no, it was a time when it was vexatious, it was done on purpose, eh? We had our heads shaved and then everyone got naked and we went to get their clothes. Well of course.
(Q - Xavier: Ah well, I'm very happy to have been born 20 years later.)
MB: Well, it's a possibility, but something interesting seems to me there, you said zealous, you used the adjective zealous. There is another example, I talked about the lawyer earlier, but when we talk about people who go on work-to-rule strike, you agree that it has nothing to do with the stagecoach strike.
(Q - Xavier: Why are people on stagecoach strike?)
MB: No, but there are people who are on work-to-rule strike, we never talked about diligence in the work-to-rule strike, so that means that diligence is not exactly the same thing.
(Q - Saïdparis: But in this example, we could say that I did a review and that I drew a result, would that possibly be enough?)< /u>
MB: It’s a very honorable version of a review. Why not.
(Q - Saïdparis: Okay, it wouldn't necessarily be something very complicated, but something that can jump out at us, and simply observe.)
MB: Why not.
(Q - Exalastro: But we can say, I look a little bit, I look at one soldier at a time, I don't necessarily see the rest, for example, I'm focused on..., I look at one, then I look at the next. There is this notion of deducing one after the other.)
MB: well you have to look at them all, you have to go through them, review them… And it’s one after the other, yes indeed, but…
(Q - Exalastro: isn't that a deduction? OK)
MB: No. [Note Bioposis: his tone is strange…]
(Q - Roc: And your review, you were naked, you said. You told us that in the 2:00 p.m. vocal…
MB: It’s true, they’re not sad memories from that time. Oh yeah, that wasn't a joke.
(Q - Roc: But why do a naked review? I don't understand, it was a joke you made, right?
MB: It was also jokes, but normally when you were drafted into the army, it was everyone naked, right? And then we went to get his clothes and…
(Q - Xavier: Are you sure it was during military service? That you weren't in a naturist camp?
(Q - Xavier: No, I said it's still quite rare that in the army, we find everyone naked, their cock showing.)< /u>
MB: Yeah, but we're not the same age huh. But no, no, it was a time when it was vexatious, it was done on purpose, eh? We had our heads shaved and then everyone got naked and we went to get their clothes. Well of course.
(Q - Xavier: Ah well, I'm very happy to have been born 20 years later.)