(Q - Exalastro: Well, I'm playing devil's advocate a bit, but I mainly listened to you and I say to myself, Well, in the cold case I didn't bother with what Max said
in the past and on January 8, we had an expression that was going to solve everything and we are, come on, I'm going to take the date of November 8, we are x months later and still nothing so start at 0, I started again at
0 saying I'm going to listen to Michel and Michel tells me that there is an expression that will solve everything and no more. What can explain this non-click? I don't know, what is it?
which however..., you were quite affirmative in what we could have managed to derive from this expression, and I say to myself well in fact I didn't succeed...)
MB: I am always affirmative but we suffer, you suffer, we suffer together at this very moment, one of the phenomena which persists in this hunt, namely that the more we talk about it, the more we confuse, the more we add, the more I I hear people saying to me, but you said that, but would that mean that? And the more it expands, the more it gets confusing, the more it becomes…
(Q - Exalastro: Well because we can't do it, because finally yes, it's the fact of saying that it seemed simple in the beginning...)
MB: What is your expression?
(Q - Exalastro: Review.)
MB: And what did you do with it?
(Q - Exalastro: Ah, I tried to look at what a senior officer did in front of his troops, to try to put it into practice since I'm supposed to review my sentries. I have everything tried.)
MB: And you did it?
(Q - Exalastro: listening to you, but apparently I haven't tried everything, otherwise I would have the owl in my hands.)
MB: Did you go there?
(Q - Exalastro: Yes.)
MB: Have you reviewed your sentries?
(Q - Exalastro: yes, applying to the letter, what I could see, what a president would do in front of his sentries, so it's not complicated, he's not making a scientific diagram à la NASA eh, he walks, he passes in front of them one by one and he looks at them and he goes in one direction. There's a little air, well there you go, he looks a little to the side and I said to myself well I have one. situation not as obvious as that but I could do a review but still nothing.)
MB: You realize that no one is interrupting you there, the silence is very heavy. You are not the only one, my dear. [yeah] They are all waiting for an answer.
(Q - Exalastro: Oh no, but we won't have any, that would be so nice.)
MB: So you reviewed your sentries. Alright. What did you deduce from this?
(Q - Exalastro: I deduced... well for example yes I have several sentries, I deduced that some could be reviewed. We usually review men, so …)
MB: You review, you reviewed them, well, and what did you get out of it?
(Q - Aladore: One direction!)
(Q - Mupsaï: That they weren't all alone...)
(Q - Skybears: There are many more!)
(Q - Exalastro: I deduced orientations, positions. I deduced a certain way of being able to review them. A review is done from a point A at point B, so there are…, I tried to model what a president could do or what we could see in any…)
MB: And what does a president or a general or something do, let’s say…
(Q - Exalastro: well he starts in a place, he positions himself, his troops are luckily well aligned for the moment, they are on his right for example, and he will look at them, he will advance straight in front of him, then they will be on his right at an angle of 90° and then he will move forward and then he will look at them one by one and he will move forward, they are very straight at attention and we move forward, we go there will…)
MB: And if there is one who has long hair or a crooked cap and he will spot him.
(Q - Exalastro: well on what Macron is doing on July 14, he doesn't stop eh, he moves straight ahead, he has a little glance at each first in line but it that's all eh, he's not going to…, he'll maybe make a list in his head but at the end of the parade he's not going to go and tell them that it was wrong, eh?)
MB: No, but the general behind him will do what is necessary.
(Q - Xavier: Yeah but that's a detailed review Michel.
MB: Oh no.
(Q - Xavier: Ah well yes, the review of details is precisely a review of details.)
MB: Did you do your military service?
(Q - Xavier: Ah yes yes, in 87 in Arras, one year.)
MB: Yeah, and have you had any reviews of details?
(Q - Xavier: Ah yes, a lot, yes, especially in the morning!)
MB: How is it going??
(Q - Xavier: It was simple, the detailed reviews, we were all, how shall I put it, lined up of course to be reviewed, we were lined up and we were told, they were finally looking, what wasn't the general eh, he was an adjutant or something, they passed by, they said hey, you have a beard, no, that's called a detailed review. On the other hand, we all had parades once. the months for example, when there was the general who came, that was something else. He didn't come to see if we had a little extra beard or a shirt with one less button. He didn't care. , he was passing..., you understand, it's not at all the same concept, it means that on the one hand there is the detailed review which precisely allows the person to be perfect, that is to say let's say that it is in the rules and the review, the general passes but it does not stop on this kind of thing.)
MB: For the review of details, your cabinets were open.
(Q - Xavier: Yes, no, but that's something else, because review of details, it can be many things, that is to say we can actually, you are right , open a cupboard to check if it was straight or this, but in general, what we called a review of details, it was up to the human, it was we went through the review of details, it was the human, that is to say there was no..., the room reviews, yes, the room reviews, it was for the equipment, but the real review was- that is to say details, it's the person, the way he is shaved, his shirt and his shoes are, but the review in the military sense, general, president, he doesn't care, the president, he passes in front of you, simply, it's a kind of, it's not at all the same concept…)
(Q - Saïdparis: He doesn't come to look if we check something, well if it's to check something, then go ahead excuse me, I'll let you finish, then I'll ask the question to Michel…)
(Q - Xavier: Because we're going to take president or general. When he passes, he doesn't stop at the fact that you have one less button, he passes in front of you, it's the character, he looks at the troops in general, the detailed review, that's precisely why we call it his name, it's that we take a person, we're going to look at what's not working, so that is called a review of details…)
MB: The review of details, that also includes the equipment Xavier.
(Q - Xavier: Yes yes, but that yes yes, that I grant you, I grant it to you, I grant it to you, that is also part of it since for example…)
MB: I don't think our sentries have any equipment? If ? Do you believe?
(Q - Xavier: No, I don't think so either, no, no no, no, for me, the problem is that if we give it to them, it's always the same, the sentries, is it that if we give them a side, when we call them sentinels or guards, we tend to give them a human side, it's obligatory since otherwise he could have called them posts or else, there he gives them on the one hand, they are humanized when we talk about sentinels or guards, we tend to say that they are not alive, that is to say, imagine taking 3 poles, we completely agree that they are not alive, but if in a treasure hunt, we consider them as, for example, sentinels or guardians, suddenly, we will humanize them, that means we will say to ourselves, well, now they're soldiers, they're more like posts in the hunt, they're soldiers and there we're going to humanize them.)
(Q - ??: An advertiser, Xavier, an advertiser.)
MB: I don't know who was talking about his review earlier and ultimately, I still don't know what came out of this review?
(Q - Exalastro: that's what you were saying, it's that we lack deduction, we can't see what's happening and the deductions from this review, it is what we are missing.)
(Q - Roc: A review is looking at appearances, it's superficial, so we're interested in the surface, right?)
(Q - Exalastro: I hear Michel, that the officer behind me will take note of what is going well or what is not going well. So if these are deductions, it is only in passing review my sentries, I must surrender…)
MB: It’s not a deduction. Oh yes, my hair is too long, he's not going to deduce that my hair is too long, he's just going to see it. He's not going to deduce anything at all, he's going to deduce that he's going to yell at me and then that he's going to…
(Q - Exalastro: Yes, that's it. He will deduce that I miss him, I don't know.)
MB: I am always affirmative but we suffer, you suffer, we suffer together at this very moment, one of the phenomena which persists in this hunt, namely that the more we talk about it, the more we confuse, the more we add, the more I I hear people saying to me, but you said that, but would that mean that? And the more it expands, the more it gets confusing, the more it becomes…
(Q - Exalastro: Well because we can't do it, because finally yes, it's the fact of saying that it seemed simple in the beginning...)
MB: What is your expression?
(Q - Exalastro: Review.)
MB: And what did you do with it?
(Q - Exalastro: Ah, I tried to look at what a senior officer did in front of his troops, to try to put it into practice since I'm supposed to review my sentries. I have everything tried.)
MB: And you did it?
(Q - Exalastro: listening to you, but apparently I haven't tried everything, otherwise I would have the owl in my hands.)
MB: Did you go there?
(Q - Exalastro: Yes.)
MB: Have you reviewed your sentries?
(Q - Exalastro: yes, applying to the letter, what I could see, what a president would do in front of his sentries, so it's not complicated, he's not making a scientific diagram à la NASA eh, he walks, he passes in front of them one by one and he looks at them and he goes in one direction. There's a little air, well there you go, he looks a little to the side and I said to myself well I have one. situation not as obvious as that but I could do a review but still nothing.)
MB: You realize that no one is interrupting you there, the silence is very heavy. You are not the only one, my dear. [yeah] They are all waiting for an answer.
(Q - Exalastro: Oh no, but we won't have any, that would be so nice.)
MB: So you reviewed your sentries. Alright. What did you deduce from this?
(Q - Exalastro: I deduced... well for example yes I have several sentries, I deduced that some could be reviewed. We usually review men, so …)
MB: You review, you reviewed them, well, and what did you get out of it?
(Q - Aladore: One direction!)
(Q - Mupsaï: That they weren't all alone...)
(Q - Skybears: There are many more!)
(Q - Exalastro: I deduced orientations, positions. I deduced a certain way of being able to review them. A review is done from a point A at point B, so there are…, I tried to model what a president could do or what we could see in any…)
MB: And what does a president or a general or something do, let’s say…
(Q - Exalastro: well he starts in a place, he positions himself, his troops are luckily well aligned for the moment, they are on his right for example, and he will look at them, he will advance straight in front of him, then they will be on his right at an angle of 90° and then he will move forward and then he will look at them one by one and he will move forward, they are very straight at attention and we move forward, we go there will…)
MB: And if there is one who has long hair or a crooked cap and he will spot him.
(Q - Exalastro: well on what Macron is doing on July 14, he doesn't stop eh, he moves straight ahead, he has a little glance at each first in line but it that's all eh, he's not going to…, he'll maybe make a list in his head but at the end of the parade he's not going to go and tell them that it was wrong, eh?)
MB: No, but the general behind him will do what is necessary.
(Q - Xavier: Yeah but that's a detailed review Michel.
MB: Oh no.
(Q - Xavier: Ah well yes, the review of details is precisely a review of details.)
MB: Did you do your military service?
(Q - Xavier: Ah yes yes, in 87 in Arras, one year.)
MB: Yeah, and have you had any reviews of details?
(Q - Xavier: Ah yes, a lot, yes, especially in the morning!)
MB: How is it going??
(Q - Xavier: It was simple, the detailed reviews, we were all, how shall I put it, lined up of course to be reviewed, we were lined up and we were told, they were finally looking, what wasn't the general eh, he was an adjutant or something, they passed by, they said hey, you have a beard, no, that's called a detailed review. On the other hand, we all had parades once. the months for example, when there was the general who came, that was something else. He didn't come to see if we had a little extra beard or a shirt with one less button. He didn't care. , he was passing..., you understand, it's not at all the same concept, it means that on the one hand there is the detailed review which precisely allows the person to be perfect, that is to say let's say that it is in the rules and the review, the general passes but it does not stop on this kind of thing.)
MB: For the review of details, your cabinets were open.
(Q - Xavier: Yes, no, but that's something else, because review of details, it can be many things, that is to say we can actually, you are right , open a cupboard to check if it was straight or this, but in general, what we called a review of details, it was up to the human, it was we went through the review of details, it was the human, that is to say there was no..., the room reviews, yes, the room reviews, it was for the equipment, but the real review was- that is to say details, it's the person, the way he is shaved, his shirt and his shoes are, but the review in the military sense, general, president, he doesn't care, the president, he passes in front of you, simply, it's a kind of, it's not at all the same concept…)
(Q - Saïdparis: He doesn't come to look if we check something, well if it's to check something, then go ahead excuse me, I'll let you finish, then I'll ask the question to Michel…)
(Q - Xavier: Because we're going to take president or general. When he passes, he doesn't stop at the fact that you have one less button, he passes in front of you, it's the character, he looks at the troops in general, the detailed review, that's precisely why we call it his name, it's that we take a person, we're going to look at what's not working, so that is called a review of details…)
MB: The review of details, that also includes the equipment Xavier.
(Q - Xavier: Yes yes, but that yes yes, that I grant you, I grant it to you, I grant it to you, that is also part of it since for example…)
MB: I don't think our sentries have any equipment? If ? Do you believe?
(Q - Xavier: No, I don't think so either, no, no no, no, for me, the problem is that if we give it to them, it's always the same, the sentries, is it that if we give them a side, when we call them sentinels or guards, we tend to give them a human side, it's obligatory since otherwise he could have called them posts or else, there he gives them on the one hand, they are humanized when we talk about sentinels or guards, we tend to say that they are not alive, that is to say, imagine taking 3 poles, we completely agree that they are not alive, but if in a treasure hunt, we consider them as, for example, sentinels or guardians, suddenly, we will humanize them, that means we will say to ourselves, well, now they're soldiers, they're more like posts in the hunt, they're soldiers and there we're going to humanize them.)
(Q - ??: An advertiser, Xavier, an advertiser.)
MB: I don't know who was talking about his review earlier and ultimately, I still don't know what came out of this review?
(Q - Exalastro: that's what you were saying, it's that we lack deduction, we can't see what's happening and the deductions from this review, it is what we are missing.)
(Q - Roc: A review is looking at appearances, it's superficial, so we're interested in the surface, right?)
(Q - Exalastro: I hear Michel, that the officer behind me will take note of what is going well or what is not going well. So if these are deductions, it is only in passing review my sentries, I must surrender…)
MB: It’s not a deduction. Oh yes, my hair is too long, he's not going to deduce that my hair is too long, he's just going to see it. He's not going to deduce anything at all, he's going to deduce that he's going to yell at me and then that he's going to…
(Q - Exalastro: Yes, that's it. He will deduce that I miss him, I don't know.)