(Q - ??: Michel, you mentioned something with the philosophy of hunting, that is to say global. Because even if the first 9 are a course and then
at the end, the last 2, we are on the ground There is still, well I can't believe, finally Max it's not possible, he hasn't disconnected the philosophy of.
the hunt, of what we can find at the end because I want him to start from the end to build his hunt. But in terms of the philosophy of hunting, there is still something to understand.
, right?)
MB: No, there is no philosophy in hunting. The only philosophy of hunting was to make money and it was a good product to sell to a client who wanted to launch his brand. Never forget that, that is the origin of hunting and its reason for being and that is why it was concocted by Max Valentin. After the way he did it, I repeat it for the Xth time, power X, the reason and the way he did it, he did what he knew how to do, a little surprise rally and then he This ultimate solution was made where there is everything to be found, which was something really very good and so good that he himself accepted the concept, it's interesting to remember it too. He himself accepted the concept of a 12th enigma. No, but do you measure the scope of the thing?
The guy hunts for 11 puzzles and after a few months, he calmly exchanges on Minitel saying yeah yeah, there's a 12th puzzle. The guy impressed himself, he said to himself, what I've done is so extraordinary, there's an enigma within the enigma. There is a 12th. But that's the problem with hunting, is that we once again started with a simple thing which was blown away not only by in the first place, chronologically speaking, by a team of players who became his thugs and then by Max himself, hunting has completely evolved. It started from something that was relatively, let's say, affordable for a lot of people, and then it expanded, it expanded, it expanded and it became completely crazy. It became endless thoughts, the most convoluted theories possible, without end.
We must always remember this, which is why I have spoken several times about a cold case. The principle of a cold case is not for nothing, it is because we have to be able to detach ourselves from the work that has been done by generations of cool people, to detach ourselves from it in an analytical way, that is to say, capturing what was said, what was done, the theories, the solutions, etc., but detaching one's mind from it when it comes to bringing one's own analysis to the subject What. It’s all the gymnastics of a cold case. A judge who takes up an old case like that, what is he doing? He starts by reading everything, watching everything. And then he says now well I'm leaving that aside, I'm starting from scratch, I'm forming my own opinion, I'm doing my own investigation.
MB: No, there is no philosophy in hunting. The only philosophy of hunting was to make money and it was a good product to sell to a client who wanted to launch his brand. Never forget that, that is the origin of hunting and its reason for being and that is why it was concocted by Max Valentin. After the way he did it, I repeat it for the Xth time, power X, the reason and the way he did it, he did what he knew how to do, a little surprise rally and then he This ultimate solution was made where there is everything to be found, which was something really very good and so good that he himself accepted the concept, it's interesting to remember it too. He himself accepted the concept of a 12th enigma. No, but do you measure the scope of the thing?
The guy hunts for 11 puzzles and after a few months, he calmly exchanges on Minitel saying yeah yeah, there's a 12th puzzle. The guy impressed himself, he said to himself, what I've done is so extraordinary, there's an enigma within the enigma. There is a 12th. But that's the problem with hunting, is that we once again started with a simple thing which was blown away not only by in the first place, chronologically speaking, by a team of players who became his thugs and then by Max himself, hunting has completely evolved. It started from something that was relatively, let's say, affordable for a lot of people, and then it expanded, it expanded, it expanded and it became completely crazy. It became endless thoughts, the most convoluted theories possible, without end.
We must always remember this, which is why I have spoken several times about a cold case. The principle of a cold case is not for nothing, it is because we have to be able to detach ourselves from the work that has been done by generations of cool people, to detach ourselves from it in an analytical way, that is to say, capturing what was said, what was done, the theories, the solutions, etc., but detaching one's mind from it when it comes to bringing one's own analysis to the subject What. It’s all the gymnastics of a cold case. A judge who takes up an old case like that, what is he doing? He starts by reading everything, watching everything. And then he says now well I'm leaving that aside, I'm starting from scratch, I'm forming my own opinion, I'm doing my own investigation.