(Q - Exalastro: It's interesting, I give 2 synonyms, rough, sorry eh, but even crosswords eh, diligent in 5 letters is zealous, it's tricky...
)
MB: That’s not it. The notion of synonym, when we say synonym, it does not mean that it has exactly the same meaning, it means that we can use one for the other. A priori, it would be exactly the same meaning, but when today we see the way in which words are used, the way in which the meaning evolves, well we cannot, how would I put it, caricature the thing by saying that means the same thing, otherwise I wouldn't have used the 2 words!
(Q - Xavier: For someone classic, someone normal, that is to say someone who will open a dictionary, because you are talking about subtlety, language, I want to hear it, but if you open any dictionary, whether it's well-known or lesser-known things like Larousse, we can't classify Larousse as junk, when you look at Larousse, if you ask synonym, he gives you zealous, so that's why, how we can help each other…)
MB: When a lawyer invoices me, he invoices me for his efforts, he does not invoice me for his zeal... OK, so here I am invoice you this much for my efforts, from such and such a date to such and such a date. OK, thank you Master.
And the day he writes to me, I'll charge you for my zeal, I'll call him, I'll tell him, wait, how much does zeal cost? It's not the same thing.
(Q - Xavier: Yes, but you can imagine what kind of nuances we have to…, it’s already complicated, so if we have to focus on this kind of little nuances…)
MB: Ha for once you have sharp and precise things in this hunt, basically I give you things which are really fine, fine, which are precise, which are adjusted al dente. You tell me Oh yeah but hey, no, no no, spaghetti and capellini, they're not the same thing, they don't have the same taste.
(Q - Exalastro: so there is a notion of time, it's not the same, al dente or not, it's played by the minute.)
MB: Come on, come on, let’s calm down. No, but it's to say that we must approach this text with, I would say with a certain, at the same time a certain simplicity and then at the same time a certain relevance, we must not just skim over it and say well, that's it. is synonymous, he used the same word twice! No, I put 2 words that have meaning.
(Q - Xavier: Yes, let's say that you really have to grasp this kind of nuance and that's where it gets complicated...)
MB: In these texts, there are not 50 either, we must not exaggerate.
(Q - Xavier: Yeah, but in these cases, hesitant, it's hesitant, measured, it's measured, it's cadenced or it's it's, it's not…, you should not take them like that because for me hesitant is when you simply hesitate, measured means that you put some measure into it, that means…)
MB: hesitant is when we hesitate…
(Q - Xavier: well yes.)
MB: Are you sure? Xavier, we have to stop there, you are literally hitting me. And I know that it's not mean but listen, honestly I'm not someone who is specious, twisted, who will spin words to mislead you, etc... I tried to give you as many clues as possible with nuances that are certainly quite fine, on a subject that is really not easy to deal with. So if I do it like that, it’s because I can’t do it any other way. If I go about it in a much more cumbersome way, I will ruin the game, I have to remain careful in what I bring as an element, and this text was written with that in mind, by saying I still want to tell them things. But hey, I'm not going to put my finger on it either, they still have to rack their brains a little.
(Q - Ash: We can go read my contribution, Xavier…)
(Q - Exalastro: Ok so any interpretation that seems to be a little too simplistic, we should be wary and say no, wait, already the example of diligent and zealous proves to us that we have a more big subtlety than the thing that would blow up in our face…)
MB: There you go
(Q - Exalastro: Okay OK okay, thank you)
MB: it doesn't jump out at you, but on the other hand when you want to look at the text, there are things to find, that's for sure.
(Q - Xavier: Can we touch the rose Michel?)
MB: Touching the rose…, the rose, it is symbolic…
(Q - Xavier: Okay, it’s symbolic…)
(Q - Palestrina: physically, we can't touch the rose, okay.)
(Q - Ash: it was just to tell Xavier that he could go read the contribution I posted yesterday.)
(Q - Roc: Yes but first you were going to say Pierrette something…)
MB: That’s not it. The notion of synonym, when we say synonym, it does not mean that it has exactly the same meaning, it means that we can use one for the other. A priori, it would be exactly the same meaning, but when today we see the way in which words are used, the way in which the meaning evolves, well we cannot, how would I put it, caricature the thing by saying that means the same thing, otherwise I wouldn't have used the 2 words!
(Q - Xavier: For someone classic, someone normal, that is to say someone who will open a dictionary, because you are talking about subtlety, language, I want to hear it, but if you open any dictionary, whether it's well-known or lesser-known things like Larousse, we can't classify Larousse as junk, when you look at Larousse, if you ask synonym, he gives you zealous, so that's why, how we can help each other…)
MB: When a lawyer invoices me, he invoices me for his efforts, he does not invoice me for his zeal... OK, so here I am invoice you this much for my efforts, from such and such a date to such and such a date. OK, thank you Master.
And the day he writes to me, I'll charge you for my zeal, I'll call him, I'll tell him, wait, how much does zeal cost? It's not the same thing.
(Q - Xavier: Yes, but you can imagine what kind of nuances we have to…, it’s already complicated, so if we have to focus on this kind of little nuances…)
MB: Ha for once you have sharp and precise things in this hunt, basically I give you things which are really fine, fine, which are precise, which are adjusted al dente. You tell me Oh yeah but hey, no, no no, spaghetti and capellini, they're not the same thing, they don't have the same taste.
(Q - Exalastro: so there is a notion of time, it's not the same, al dente or not, it's played by the minute.)
MB: Come on, come on, let’s calm down. No, but it's to say that we must approach this text with, I would say with a certain, at the same time a certain simplicity and then at the same time a certain relevance, we must not just skim over it and say well, that's it. is synonymous, he used the same word twice! No, I put 2 words that have meaning.
(Q - Xavier: Yes, let's say that you really have to grasp this kind of nuance and that's where it gets complicated...)
MB: In these texts, there are not 50 either, we must not exaggerate.
(Q - Xavier: Yeah, but in these cases, hesitant, it's hesitant, measured, it's measured, it's cadenced or it's it's, it's not…, you should not take them like that because for me hesitant is when you simply hesitate, measured means that you put some measure into it, that means…)
MB: hesitant is when we hesitate…
(Q - Xavier: well yes.)
MB: Are you sure? Xavier, we have to stop there, you are literally hitting me. And I know that it's not mean but listen, honestly I'm not someone who is specious, twisted, who will spin words to mislead you, etc... I tried to give you as many clues as possible with nuances that are certainly quite fine, on a subject that is really not easy to deal with. So if I do it like that, it’s because I can’t do it any other way. If I go about it in a much more cumbersome way, I will ruin the game, I have to remain careful in what I bring as an element, and this text was written with that in mind, by saying I still want to tell them things. But hey, I'm not going to put my finger on it either, they still have to rack their brains a little.
(Q - Ash: We can go read my contribution, Xavier…)
(Q - Exalastro: Ok so any interpretation that seems to be a little too simplistic, we should be wary and say no, wait, already the example of diligent and zealous proves to us that we have a more big subtlety than the thing that would blow up in our face…)
MB: There you go
(Q - Exalastro: Okay OK okay, thank you)
MB: it doesn't jump out at you, but on the other hand when you want to look at the text, there are things to find, that's for sure.
(Q - Xavier: Can we touch the rose Michel?)
MB: Touching the rose…, the rose, it is symbolic…
(Q - Xavier: Okay, it’s symbolic…)
(Q - Palestrina: physically, we can't touch the rose, okay.)
(Q - Ash: it was just to tell Xavier that he could go read the contribution I posted yesterday.)
(Q - Roc: Yes but first you were going to say Pierrette something…)