(Q - Palestrina: Yes, but here for example Michel, I'm just intervening for that. It's because you're talking about reflexes. But for us, benchmarks are tangible in
fact, that's the word that needs to be added in fact, tangible for us, when we talk about a benchmark, it's necessarily something tangible that we can touch and it's true that you, when you mentioned
possible front markers, you talk about reflexes, but reflexes…)
MB: I'm going to give you another notion of reference which is very interesting, you do with it what you want. It is said and verified that when you are on a road in a car on which you skid, there is a place where you should not look, that is where you are afraid to go, you have to look where you want go. In other words, when the car goes in all directions, you must not look at the ravine, you must look at the road and wherever you want to go, your reflexes follow. It’s a notion of reference.
(Q - Xavier: ultimately, to close, does that mean that the benchmarks can be reflex benchmarks, as you had already explained?)
MB: exactly.
(Q - Exalastro: but that doesn't answer tangible or not tangible there…)
MB: what is not tangible yet?
(Q - Xavier: a reflex is not tangible. Well, logically, if I listen to Michel, a reflex is not tangible since he talks about reflexes...)< /i>
(Q - Palestrina: the last tangible landmarks are the sentinels. I understood it like that.)
(Q - Exalastro: I understood it like that too…)
(Q - Xavier: well me too…)
(Q - Palestrina: I have benchmarks in my life, things that have served as benchmarks for me, people, people, all of that is benchmarks…)
MB: well there you go, the notions of benchmarks are still a little broader than something we have under our noses, there you go, it can take on a slightly different meaning, especially in a certain context , etc… So be cool, don't wonder, don't question it, find it and once you're there, you'll see that it's coming, don't wonder if it will come until you get there. you are not, you will not be able to know.
(Q - Palestrina: Of course, but at least there it is clear on the tangible side, you see Michel, because that is more what posed the problem to people and which is the debate sometimes it’s because as on tangible we didn’t really know…)
.
MB: I know, I know, but there are things that I can't explain, there are things that I can't explain completely because that would be giving you too much information. I'm trying to guide you, that's it, that's why my words seem from time to time a little vague, a little contrived, and I know that some people rebel against the fact that I say but yes but no, it tells nothing but bullshit. It's not easy, these are really subjects where it's not easy to give honest answers. I could do things with ellipsis, like Max, like I can't answer you by implying that well it's still important but I don't want to do that. I'm trying to tell you things that allow you, that could allow you when the time comes to feel comfortable with what you will have to do, in fact, to find the cache.
(Q - Xavier: No, but we understood that well, eh Michel, we know very well that you are not trying to confuse us. It was simply that originally, you know, when you announced, it was really new that the sentinels, it was the last marker to use and then how to say to find Automatically, it eliminated all the tracks afterwards, that means…, I will tell you. give a concrete example, you will understand and everyone will understand. There was a time, there were a lot of people, those who were on Dabo's side, looking for example at Chemin des Terminals, but that was it. afterwards, they arrived at the sentries, where they made their salamalec and afterwards, they found something. So as you said that it was the last physical marker, that no longer existed since automatically there were no more physical markers afterwards. , since we cannot reuse another physical marker after, before we can reuse a marker, which can be a reflex marker, but on the other hand we could no longer use markers after, from the moment you said that, that is to say because if my sentries told me to go find 100 meters, 200 meters, 300 meters at the so-and-so terminal, we could no longer do it since automatically the sentries were the last physical marker. There, that was it.)
MB: I'm going to give you another notion of reference which is very interesting, you do with it what you want. It is said and verified that when you are on a road in a car on which you skid, there is a place where you should not look, that is where you are afraid to go, you have to look where you want go. In other words, when the car goes in all directions, you must not look at the ravine, you must look at the road and wherever you want to go, your reflexes follow. It’s a notion of reference.
(Q - Xavier: ultimately, to close, does that mean that the benchmarks can be reflex benchmarks, as you had already explained?)
MB: exactly.
(Q - Exalastro: but that doesn't answer tangible or not tangible there…)
MB: what is not tangible yet?
(Q - Xavier: a reflex is not tangible. Well, logically, if I listen to Michel, a reflex is not tangible since he talks about reflexes...)< /i>
(Q - Palestrina: the last tangible landmarks are the sentinels. I understood it like that.)
(Q - Exalastro: I understood it like that too…)
(Q - Xavier: well me too…)
(Q - Palestrina: I have benchmarks in my life, things that have served as benchmarks for me, people, people, all of that is benchmarks…)
MB: well there you go, the notions of benchmarks are still a little broader than something we have under our noses, there you go, it can take on a slightly different meaning, especially in a certain context , etc… So be cool, don't wonder, don't question it, find it and once you're there, you'll see that it's coming, don't wonder if it will come until you get there. you are not, you will not be able to know.
(Q - Palestrina: Of course, but at least there it is clear on the tangible side, you see Michel, because that is more what posed the problem to people and which is the debate sometimes it’s because as on tangible we didn’t really know…)
.
MB: I know, I know, but there are things that I can't explain, there are things that I can't explain completely because that would be giving you too much information. I'm trying to guide you, that's it, that's why my words seem from time to time a little vague, a little contrived, and I know that some people rebel against the fact that I say but yes but no, it tells nothing but bullshit. It's not easy, these are really subjects where it's not easy to give honest answers. I could do things with ellipsis, like Max, like I can't answer you by implying that well it's still important but I don't want to do that. I'm trying to tell you things that allow you, that could allow you when the time comes to feel comfortable with what you will have to do, in fact, to find the cache.
(Q - Xavier: No, but we understood that well, eh Michel, we know very well that you are not trying to confuse us. It was simply that originally, you know, when you announced, it was really new that the sentinels, it was the last marker to use and then how to say to find Automatically, it eliminated all the tracks afterwards, that means…, I will tell you. give a concrete example, you will understand and everyone will understand. There was a time, there were a lot of people, those who were on Dabo's side, looking for example at Chemin des Terminals, but that was it. afterwards, they arrived at the sentries, where they made their salamalec and afterwards, they found something. So as you said that it was the last physical marker, that no longer existed since automatically there were no more physical markers afterwards. , since we cannot reuse another physical marker after, before we can reuse a marker, which can be a reflex marker, but on the other hand we could no longer use markers after, from the moment you said that, that is to say because if my sentries told me to go find 100 meters, 200 meters, 300 meters at the so-and-so terminal, we could no longer do it since automatically the sentries were the last physical marker. There, that was it.)