(Q - Roc: A real question about Pierrette, “in one place everything begins, in one point, everything ends until the end of the path, her steps carried her”, she makes a
course, you've been talking to us for 2 years about a surprise rally course. I'm a basic guy, a course is geographical and so we start from the beginning and we wander from enigma to enigma, we arrive.
in the enigma of the 10 cities Pierrette, she continues to walk through the 10 cities, it's part of her journey, for me, it's such obvious logic, but I got to the point of wanting to check because.
the majority of researchers contradict me on this.
MB: No, but you shouldn’t listen to researchers. I am well placed to know! The first thing to consider is that Pierrette, when she tells her story like that, when she gives you her little poem, well, she has completed the journey, eh? It’s okay, she did it, she walked the path, that’s it.
(Q - Roc: And she travels through the 10 cities too?)
MB: In any case, she’s been there.
(Q - Roc: OK, she finished her journey.)
MB: Yeah, she finished her journey. But the owls, that's a great principle, you have to know about the Discord, but you do it well Roc, I don't have the impression of teaching you anything because you're someone quite measured and [paced!] no, no, very careful. And so we absolutely must not give in to the theories that are exposed on the discord. We must listen to them, we must debate them, we must compare them, but we must not doubt, a comparison means we compare and then we decide. We say well yes I agree or no, I don't agree, but we shouldn't question a conviction every time there are theories that come out.
It's a big problem with this hunt, it's the conviction parameter, for lots of reasons, lots, lots of reasons, there really will be I think there will be studies, it's not me who would do, but there are certainly people who will do behavioral studies on everything that happened in this hunt, because behaviors are frequently, very frequently altered, influenced, by external interventions, by history, by convictions that have been anchored for a long time and that is precisely what should not be done, the person who will be able to find is someone who at a given moment will have the strength of character to abstract themselves from influences and tell me , my conviction is that, I'm going to the end.
So there are some who do it, but they go to the end by adjusting a little with the parameters, for the most part, little things that don't fit and everything, but hey, we're going anyway. If we are rigorous, normally we can achieve this perfectly, but it is true that the phenomenon of conviction, the need for conviction is still very present and it is really very widespread. I see it in writings, a lot, I see people who change, I have seen it in my private messages and I can detect it well. There are a lot of people who change their orientation, who change their minds like their shirts.
It is still the testimony of a fundamental wavering in the reasonings, if we manage to progress, well let's already talk about the first 9 enigmas. If we manage to make a journey and we are convinced of our journey, etc., well that means that we have arrived somewhere and from there we must continue in the same direction, in the same path, it you must not change, you must not question, you must not doubt anything.
It's true that when we were talking with Aladore earlier, and seeing how quickly doubt arises, this is not a criticism for him of course, but he is not the only one, doubt arises very quickly because I said something, because we interpret it, but it can't work like that. You have to be much more impervious and follow his direction, understand what he says, hear each other clearly, that can surely be interesting for many, but that's not why you have to question everything. every time.
(Q - Roc: Michel, it’s the lack of checkpoint, the problem is also there because…)
MB: The checkpoints, do you mean by that, the validation of the puzzles?
(Q - Roc: That is to say we arrive at 3 or 4 enigmas and then we have something which really confirms to us that the first 3 or 4 are done and there we don't have not a check point so that’s why the doubt is there for me…)
MB: Yes, but what is amazing for me is to think that not everyone starts from the same place. Already, not everyone starts from the same place, so just the first riddle, if I say well here's the solution to the first riddle that's it, we stop discussing, let's go, I'm already going to distort the game somewhere.
(Q - Roc: But the specifications confirmed that it is Bourges...)
MB: [laughs]
MB: No, but you shouldn’t listen to researchers. I am well placed to know! The first thing to consider is that Pierrette, when she tells her story like that, when she gives you her little poem, well, she has completed the journey, eh? It’s okay, she did it, she walked the path, that’s it.
(Q - Roc: And she travels through the 10 cities too?)
MB: In any case, she’s been there.
(Q - Roc: OK, she finished her journey.)
MB: Yeah, she finished her journey. But the owls, that's a great principle, you have to know about the Discord, but you do it well Roc, I don't have the impression of teaching you anything because you're someone quite measured and [paced!] no, no, very careful. And so we absolutely must not give in to the theories that are exposed on the discord. We must listen to them, we must debate them, we must compare them, but we must not doubt, a comparison means we compare and then we decide. We say well yes I agree or no, I don't agree, but we shouldn't question a conviction every time there are theories that come out.
It's a big problem with this hunt, it's the conviction parameter, for lots of reasons, lots, lots of reasons, there really will be I think there will be studies, it's not me who would do, but there are certainly people who will do behavioral studies on everything that happened in this hunt, because behaviors are frequently, very frequently altered, influenced, by external interventions, by history, by convictions that have been anchored for a long time and that is precisely what should not be done, the person who will be able to find is someone who at a given moment will have the strength of character to abstract themselves from influences and tell me , my conviction is that, I'm going to the end.
So there are some who do it, but they go to the end by adjusting a little with the parameters, for the most part, little things that don't fit and everything, but hey, we're going anyway. If we are rigorous, normally we can achieve this perfectly, but it is true that the phenomenon of conviction, the need for conviction is still very present and it is really very widespread. I see it in writings, a lot, I see people who change, I have seen it in my private messages and I can detect it well. There are a lot of people who change their orientation, who change their minds like their shirts.
It is still the testimony of a fundamental wavering in the reasonings, if we manage to progress, well let's already talk about the first 9 enigmas. If we manage to make a journey and we are convinced of our journey, etc., well that means that we have arrived somewhere and from there we must continue in the same direction, in the same path, it you must not change, you must not question, you must not doubt anything.
It's true that when we were talking with Aladore earlier, and seeing how quickly doubt arises, this is not a criticism for him of course, but he is not the only one, doubt arises very quickly because I said something, because we interpret it, but it can't work like that. You have to be much more impervious and follow his direction, understand what he says, hear each other clearly, that can surely be interesting for many, but that's not why you have to question everything. every time.
(Q - Roc: Michel, it’s the lack of checkpoint, the problem is also there because…)
MB: The checkpoints, do you mean by that, the validation of the puzzles?
(Q - Roc: That is to say we arrive at 3 or 4 enigmas and then we have something which really confirms to us that the first 3 or 4 are done and there we don't have not a check point so that’s why the doubt is there for me…)
MB: Yes, but what is amazing for me is to think that not everyone starts from the same place. Already, not everyone starts from the same place, so just the first riddle, if I say well here's the solution to the first riddle that's it, we stop discussing, let's go, I'm already going to distort the game somewhere.
(Q - Roc: But the specifications confirmed that it is Bourges...)
MB: [laughs]