(Q - ??: I have a question, but it relates to information that you gave, already a few months ago, maybe a few years now, on the fact that it
There was no false lead intended by Max, in any case planned from the start of the game. And this is something that I must say which totally blocks my research because in quite a few puzzles, I have.
often a solution which basically leads to Dabo and a 2nd which seems to me as simple or as complicated depending, but which is therefore different but which in any case seems to me not to be a coincidence and so I can't really know.
if when you say false trail it's really at the level of deciphering an enigma or is it something more global?)
MB: So when I say false trail, I say there is no false trail so I maintain that and... Curiously, I had exchanges of letters, emails, etc., with Max Valentin, where he explains to me that he made lots of false leads, etc. So there we were in Max Valentin who got his head blown and said “yes I did this, I did that” . In other words, he is trying to show me that he consciously wanted what the game actually provoked among the owls. Because hey, the false leads were entirely developed by the owls.
False trails do not exist in the hunt itself, it is an invention of the Chouetteurs.
On the other hand, what Max Valentin practiced extensively, it was one of the foundations of his profession, is to use vocabulary which can have a double meaning or which can have a slightly cryptic meaning, as we use certain words in advertising language, which are not a priori necessarily used for this or that product, but which, when we use them, give a more flattering image of the product, or possibly in the case of our enigmas , certain words which can be a little misleading, where we can head off on something but it's not constructed leads, it's not at the level of a complete enigma.
(Q - ??: Yeah, you say to yourself that there are pitfalls, but that doesn't give different solutions…)
MB: It’s vocabulary traps, that’s it, that’s what his thing was, it’s vocabulary traps. So after he…
MB: So when I say false trail, I say there is no false trail so I maintain that and... Curiously, I had exchanges of letters, emails, etc., with Max Valentin, where he explains to me that he made lots of false leads, etc. So there we were in Max Valentin who got his head blown and said “yes I did this, I did that” . In other words, he is trying to show me that he consciously wanted what the game actually provoked among the owls. Because hey, the false leads were entirely developed by the owls.
False trails do not exist in the hunt itself, it is an invention of the Chouetteurs.
On the other hand, what Max Valentin practiced extensively, it was one of the foundations of his profession, is to use vocabulary which can have a double meaning or which can have a slightly cryptic meaning, as we use certain words in advertising language, which are not a priori necessarily used for this or that product, but which, when we use them, give a more flattering image of the product, or possibly in the case of our enigmas , certain words which can be a little misleading, where we can head off on something but it's not constructed leads, it's not at the level of a complete enigma.
(Q - ??: Yeah, you say to yourself that there are pitfalls, but that doesn't give different solutions…)
MB: It’s vocabulary traps, that’s it, that’s what his thing was, it’s vocabulary traps. So after he…