(Q - ??: I wanted to come back to the expression, there is currently an expression which is currently commonly accepted there, however what I do not understand, if it is that important
and should appear in all versions?)
MB: expression by definition is several words, it evokes a concept and there are several ways of evoking something. The expression is one, but in the case that interests us, it is indeed the expression to which we must attach.
(Q - ??: So it’s not necessarily in all versions?)
MB: No, probably not. No, I don't think it's in all versions.
(Q - Palestrina: I asked you the question a moment ago and you answered no very clearly, that in fact what Father Méhus was was not the expression, but that was the notion. We actually found this notion there.)
MB: Yes, I just agree.
MB: expression by definition is several words, it evokes a concept and there are several ways of evoking something. The expression is one, but in the case that interests us, it is indeed the expression to which we must attach.
(Q - ??: So it’s not necessarily in all versions?)
MB: No, probably not. No, I don't think it's in all versions.
(Q - Palestrina: I asked you the question a moment ago and you answered no very clearly, that in fact what Father Méhus was was not the expression, but that was the notion. We actually found this notion there.)
MB: Yes, I just agree.