(Q - ??: Michel, please. And so, what is missing for the entity to find in your opinion or is there any advice
or something that could be applicable to all researchers?)
MB: What we should learn from it is not that. No, but it's funny because you focus on the fact that in your mind, the entity is blocked, the entity is not blocked. I'm talking about an entity eh, you hear it, but we're talking about this person, so who found things, she's not stuck, she's where she is, and for her it's nothing. past.
(Q - ??: She takes her time, but she appreciates it.)
(Q - Joker: Let Michel speak, please.)
MB: Look, I don't have any advice to give, I just want you to think that some of you sometimes state truths, things that fit perfectly with what needs to be done. For reasons that escape me, perhaps not all of them, but that I cannot control, it goes by the wayside, it is not retained, it is not noted, it is not debated , this is not discussed. Or it's discussed but it's reoriented, it goes in another direction and that's what I was talking about earlier, the fact of focusing on perhaps certain details and remaining very... You still have to be very rigorous in your approach, we are talking about a game I agree, there were 30 years during which all delusions were permitted. They still are, eh, for those who want to indulge in it. But if we want to find today, we need a little more rigor, we need to take a slightly more scientific approach by saying “well, what is a clue and what is not? 'is not ? What is demonstrated, what is not,” and so on. You have to be quite rigorous though. I think that's advice that could be useful.
MB: What we should learn from it is not that. No, but it's funny because you focus on the fact that in your mind, the entity is blocked, the entity is not blocked. I'm talking about an entity eh, you hear it, but we're talking about this person, so who found things, she's not stuck, she's where she is, and for her it's nothing. past.
(Q - ??: She takes her time, but she appreciates it.)
(Q - Joker: Let Michel speak, please.)
MB: Look, I don't have any advice to give, I just want you to think that some of you sometimes state truths, things that fit perfectly with what needs to be done. For reasons that escape me, perhaps not all of them, but that I cannot control, it goes by the wayside, it is not retained, it is not noted, it is not debated , this is not discussed. Or it's discussed but it's reoriented, it goes in another direction and that's what I was talking about earlier, the fact of focusing on perhaps certain details and remaining very... You still have to be very rigorous in your approach, we are talking about a game I agree, there were 30 years during which all delusions were permitted. They still are, eh, for those who want to indulge in it. But if we want to find today, we need a little more rigor, we need to take a slightly more scientific approach by saying “well, what is a clue and what is not? 'is not ? What is demonstrated, what is not,” and so on. You have to be quite rigorous though. I think that's advice that could be useful.