(Q - CatsEyes: No, I don't share that idea. In fact, let's say that as you have Michel reframed things a little more, that actually leaves less to interpretation, so
we have to stay, I want to say, I have the impression that we have to be a little more pragmatic and then to actually find ideas, well a little more down to earth and pragmatic, I think that's it.
is that which is a little more complicated and we try things and things and then it doesn't come to that? So ultimately it's also the fact of having reduced the field of possibilities, if I may say so.
we're going to avoid looking for completely crazy things and sparkles etc... Well it's true that it reframes things and as a result, we're obliged to find things a little more down to earth, pragmatic, except that well here it is, a
once we've gone around, it's difficult to have new good ideas like that spring up. Well, that's how I perceive it, the thing.)
MB: So I think there are two things to say about that. Good ideas. I like this notion of good ideas, but there have been a lot of good ideas over the past 30 years, eh? Good ideas in themselves are not necessarily synonymous with discovering anything. They can be satisfactory. I think a lot of people had fun brainstorming these good ideas, but today my… how am I going to say this… my goal, what I would like is for the hunt to end, how am I going to say this… properly.
That is to say that the approach is taken to solve the puzzles. At one point, it was a bit in all directions, everything was possible, etc. There, indeed, it is refocused, but it is refocused in a... from my point of view, from my side as an organizer it is refocused with the objective of encouraging people to push reasoning in a way finer, perhaps paying attention to more details, for certain details that are missed. These are things like that, so I understand that it's less distracting, it's perhaps less exciting, it's a little more technical, but it's still a necessary step if you want to find something.
Silence….The class is very well behaved this evening.
(Q - CatsEyes: We are all so happy to hear you that we are all good tonight.)
MB: So I think there are two things to say about that. Good ideas. I like this notion of good ideas, but there have been a lot of good ideas over the past 30 years, eh? Good ideas in themselves are not necessarily synonymous with discovering anything. They can be satisfactory. I think a lot of people had fun brainstorming these good ideas, but today my… how am I going to say this… my goal, what I would like is for the hunt to end, how am I going to say this… properly.
That is to say that the approach is taken to solve the puzzles. At one point, it was a bit in all directions, everything was possible, etc. There, indeed, it is refocused, but it is refocused in a... from my point of view, from my side as an organizer it is refocused with the objective of encouraging people to push reasoning in a way finer, perhaps paying attention to more details, for certain details that are missed. These are things like that, so I understand that it's less distracting, it's perhaps less exciting, it's a little more technical, but it's still a necessary step if you want to find something.
Silence….The class is very well behaved this evening.
(Q - CatsEyes: We are all so happy to hear you that we are all good tonight.)