(Q - Hoshi: Michel, it's Hoshi. I have a quick question about our conversation. You said that the person's connection had been helped by Pierrette. But at the same time,
you told me that the person had understood the numbers before Pierrette. So how is this possible?)
.
MB: First of all, I didn't say the person. I have to be really careful because every time you... In any case, there aren't many people there but there are some. What you are trying to know is whether without Pierrette's text we can actually still find it. That's it, did I understand correctly? If we want to make it simple and understandable, that's the meaning of the question, right? Um yes without Pierrette, we can find yes, but Pierrette is a plus. We can find what was exposed to me but what was exposed to me is not the definitive solution, it is the understanding of a mechanism. We agree, right?
.
MB: First of all, I didn't say the person. I have to be really careful because every time you... In any case, there aren't many people there but there are some. What you are trying to know is whether without Pierrette's text we can actually still find it. That's it, did I understand correctly? If we want to make it simple and understandable, that's the meaning of the question, right? Um yes without Pierrette, we can find yes, but Pierrette is a plus. We can find what was exposed to me but what was exposed to me is not the definitive solution, it is the understanding of a mechanism. We agree, right?