Moteur de recherche & Synthèse des "Midits" sur le jeu "Sur la trace de la Chouette d'Or ®"

<< Back

08/05/2023 - Vocal n° 58 - 02:41:00 :00: Statistics of people who walked on the Chouette

(Q - Brybry colibri: already, I wanted to thank you for reading Father Méhus; I asked you the question a long time ago, so it was nice to listen to it. Quick question, I don't I don't know if you'll like it, but you told us about a statistic, so I'll come back, I understand if you're messing with what you want to develop, the famous statistic of people who would have stepped on the owl or not or not tonight, I would understand.)

MB: So, if you ask me the question, if I give you the statistic, you will deduce something from it.

(Q - Brybry hummingbird: Yes, but not of much use, yes, but not of much use, it's just misplaced curiosity.)

MB: If I tell you five, what do you deduce from that?

(Q - Brybry hummingbird: Not often frequented. That it was you and Max Valentin who went through there with the Bailiff.)

MB: Okay, what if I tell you 40,000?

(Q - Brybry hummingbird: A certain number of people who like to walk on it. That there are a certain number of people, researchers or not, who cares who like to walk on it.)< /i>

MB: Well, they don't like it because they don't know.

(Q - Sylvain: 40,000, it's not possible. Michel seen the photo of the bailiff, the ground is not packed.)
(Q - Samsam: 40,000 is Dabo, 5 is not Dabo. 40,000 can be a hiking trail, a park, something fairly busy.)
(Q - BlackCorbac: It's 30 years guys.)

MB: What do you think we can deduce from such a statistic? Is there something to deduce that could be used to solve the puzzles?

(Q - ??: Not much, no, it's a little extra, we'll say that. It's misplaced curiosity.)
(Q - Sylvain: That's not a bad position, it was Michel who teased us.)

MB: It’s my role, eh, to tease you. I get messages saying to myself: Yeah, things are snoozing on the discord and should be restarted a bit. I'm restarting eh.