(Q - ??: Good evening Mr. Beker, I wanted to ask you a question about that. What surprises me is that the person seems to have understood the mechanism, the figures
, all this intertwined, but nevertheless did not put it into practice, did not a priori state a super solution using this mechanism.)
MB: Because we are in a story that is crazy. We are in a story that has lasted for 30 years, where so much has happened that even today, the players who are on the right thing are not necessarily aware, don't... If they were in front of me and let me tell them, well, that’s it. They might even have a hard time believing it.
You still have to, you have to manage to integrate the fact and I have told you this very often, I have written it, I have said it, I repeat it, the fact that this hunt is in a very particular, very exceptional, very unexpected both because of its duration, both because of the character of Max Valentin who went completely into a tailspin and who gave us, who colored this story in a completely unexpected way and both again due to the fact that the participants in the game have constituted themselves as they have constituted themselves, have published everything they have published and that they come out of that, that there are ideas which are considered good, d others which are considered bad, therefore the generally accepted and the generally refuted.
All of this is something that makes even someone who is on the right track today. There are so many things in front of him that he is not necessarily aware that, well, yes, that’s it.
(Q - ??: Okay, the idea launched, but without him having the conviction, in fact behind what he just has, is that it?)
MB: Yes, there can be no conviction since in fact I am telling you what I read in my private messages, it is very often this diary tone where people speak to me, but they speak to each other to themselves somewhere, they list their ideas, they tell me and so on. But without necessarily even trying to measure its scope, it's just a matter of saying, well, I thought about that. I thought about that, I thought about that. Then it turns out that well yes, how many thought about it.
(Q - ??: Good evening Michel, thank you, we can say that a person who unwittingly has the right solution can say to themselves Ah, that can't be it. Other people do would have thought before. It seems too simple.)
MB: It can happen. It can happen, but what you have to take away from the major information that you have to take away from all of this is that it's findable. It's really important all the same, even for me, eh, I mean, if I'm talking to you about it, it's because for me it's decisive. I say to myself, I'm trying to do the job, but it's difficult to measure the result until it's found. I can't know if I've really said everything that needs to be said and, ultimately, I might even fear saying too much.
MB: Because we are in a story that is crazy. We are in a story that has lasted for 30 years, where so much has happened that even today, the players who are on the right thing are not necessarily aware, don't... If they were in front of me and let me tell them, well, that’s it. They might even have a hard time believing it.
You still have to, you have to manage to integrate the fact and I have told you this very often, I have written it, I have said it, I repeat it, the fact that this hunt is in a very particular, very exceptional, very unexpected both because of its duration, both because of the character of Max Valentin who went completely into a tailspin and who gave us, who colored this story in a completely unexpected way and both again due to the fact that the participants in the game have constituted themselves as they have constituted themselves, have published everything they have published and that they come out of that, that there are ideas which are considered good, d others which are considered bad, therefore the generally accepted and the generally refuted.
All of this is something that makes even someone who is on the right track today. There are so many things in front of him that he is not necessarily aware that, well, yes, that’s it.
(Q - ??: Okay, the idea launched, but without him having the conviction, in fact behind what he just has, is that it?)
MB: Yes, there can be no conviction since in fact I am telling you what I read in my private messages, it is very often this diary tone where people speak to me, but they speak to each other to themselves somewhere, they list their ideas, they tell me and so on. But without necessarily even trying to measure its scope, it's just a matter of saying, well, I thought about that. I thought about that, I thought about that. Then it turns out that well yes, how many thought about it.
(Q - ??: Good evening Michel, thank you, we can say that a person who unwittingly has the right solution can say to themselves Ah, that can't be it. Other people do would have thought before. It seems too simple.)
MB: It can happen. It can happen, but what you have to take away from the major information that you have to take away from all of this is that it's findable. It's really important all the same, even for me, eh, I mean, if I'm talking to you about it, it's because for me it's decisive. I say to myself, I'm trying to do the job, but it's difficult to measure the result until it's found. I can't know if I've really said everything that needs to be said and, ultimately, I might even fear saying too much.