(Q - Gringos: yes, but I would like to clarify if for example, a player in 1993 finds in a puzzle 3 kilometers away, you will have to find a lighthouse, to check, he finds a lighthouse by inquiring
on the area, but to verify his hypothesis, he uses a map, to see Ah well there I measure, that's 3 kilometers, that's good, that fits too.)
MB: I don’t understand the question?
(Q - Gringos: the question is that, so here I need one, for example to validate a hypothesis which is an object 3 kilometers away, you need a map otherwise I I don't see how to validate that it is 3 kilometers away since there is a riddle, who will tell me at 3 kilometers, will you find something?)
MB: listen, there is something that I would like to understand, frankly, there is something which is… I have read a lot of messages since yesterday, I wrote it to you. There is something I would like to understand. Today I say today now…
(Q - Gringo s: today not 93?)
MB: no no, we are today I am very young in 93, I was barely born, so today, when we talk about all that, if you need information, you are able to find it in seconds. Do we agree?
(Q - Gringos: we agree.)
MB: So why are you interested in knowing if it was more difficult, how difficult it was in 1993? Why do you care if you need a 2nd card, a 3rd card, an encyclopedia, 2 encyclopedias or 3 encyclopedias? Why does this interest you? Sincerely?
(Q - Gringos: what interests me is when he wrote 8000 measures from a place and I therefore take a good distance. Well, that's it. Originally , there was necessarily a card but except that there is the organizer of the game…)
MB: what does that change for you, what does it change for you today? Sincerely.
(Q - Gringos: what does it change for me, nothing, but for some they will say no 8000 measurements, it was not a distance, there is a trick to find…)
MB: but who some? who some?
(Q - Gringos: Aladore, now, won't leave his zone, he will say no 8000 measurements, it's not a distance, it's a trick that we haven't discovered... )
(Q - Palestrina: that's it! In fact the problem Michel is that there are some who interpret your words, really literally and when you say well suddenly, there is no need for a 2nd card…)
MB: no no no no no no no no, you stop immediately, interpreting is not literally, if it is literally, there is no possible interpretation. Taking a text literally means that it’s written like that, I take it like that. Interpreting it means, it's written like that, but maybe it means...I'm talking about my words.
(Q - Palestrina: okay, but when you say there is no need for a 2nd card, some will say Ah well if there is no need for a 2nd card, that means to say that in fact the 8000 measurements is not even a distance in fact, that's what you mean Gringos in fact, that means that there are some who will say Ah Well Michel he said he there is no 2nd card…)
MB: I don't see the connection, explain to me why the fact that I say there is no need for a 2nd card would explain that 8000 measurements is not a distance, explain to me?
(Q - Palestrina: basically there are people today who are looking for the Sentinels on the first map. As you said that there are more than 2nd maps, well there are , they eliminate the 2nd but they still need the Sentinels so they have to find these sentries somewhere so he finds them on the first map.
(Q - ??: not necessarily on a card, just in fact, when we tell you you don't need a 2nd card, well you say so you have to find it with some cleverness...)< /i>
MB: wait, wait, wait, it’s going too fast. I said that the map is a tool, that I know is debated, because Max said the map is not a tool, I say, the map is a tool so who understands what in this terminology ?
(Q - But do you say that the 2nd card is a tool, Michel, can you say the 2nd card is a tool?)< br />
MB: of course, listen to my answer, if you use a 2nd card, it's a tool. Same as the first card. Maps are tools.
No but wait, wait, wait, wait, what would you call it, what terminology do you use to define a map in a treasure hunt, it's a tool, what is it? What would you call that?
MB: I don’t understand the question?
(Q - Gringos: the question is that, so here I need one, for example to validate a hypothesis which is an object 3 kilometers away, you need a map otherwise I I don't see how to validate that it is 3 kilometers away since there is a riddle, who will tell me at 3 kilometers, will you find something?)
MB: listen, there is something that I would like to understand, frankly, there is something which is… I have read a lot of messages since yesterday, I wrote it to you. There is something I would like to understand. Today I say today now…
(Q - Gringo s: today not 93?)
MB: no no, we are today I am very young in 93, I was barely born, so today, when we talk about all that, if you need information, you are able to find it in seconds. Do we agree?
(Q - Gringos: we agree.)
MB: So why are you interested in knowing if it was more difficult, how difficult it was in 1993? Why do you care if you need a 2nd card, a 3rd card, an encyclopedia, 2 encyclopedias or 3 encyclopedias? Why does this interest you? Sincerely?
(Q - Gringos: what interests me is when he wrote 8000 measures from a place and I therefore take a good distance. Well, that's it. Originally , there was necessarily a card but except that there is the organizer of the game…)
MB: what does that change for you, what does it change for you today? Sincerely.
(Q - Gringos: what does it change for me, nothing, but for some they will say no 8000 measurements, it was not a distance, there is a trick to find…)
MB: but who some? who some?
(Q - Gringos: Aladore, now, won't leave his zone, he will say no 8000 measurements, it's not a distance, it's a trick that we haven't discovered... )
(Q - Palestrina: that's it! In fact the problem Michel is that there are some who interpret your words, really literally and when you say well suddenly, there is no need for a 2nd card…)
MB: no no no no no no no no, you stop immediately, interpreting is not literally, if it is literally, there is no possible interpretation. Taking a text literally means that it’s written like that, I take it like that. Interpreting it means, it's written like that, but maybe it means...I'm talking about my words.
(Q - Palestrina: okay, but when you say there is no need for a 2nd card, some will say Ah well if there is no need for a 2nd card, that means to say that in fact the 8000 measurements is not even a distance in fact, that's what you mean Gringos in fact, that means that there are some who will say Ah Well Michel he said he there is no 2nd card…)
MB: I don't see the connection, explain to me why the fact that I say there is no need for a 2nd card would explain that 8000 measurements is not a distance, explain to me?
(Q - Palestrina: basically there are people today who are looking for the Sentinels on the first map. As you said that there are more than 2nd maps, well there are , they eliminate the 2nd but they still need the Sentinels so they have to find these sentries somewhere so he finds them on the first map.
(Q - ??: not necessarily on a card, just in fact, when we tell you you don't need a 2nd card, well you say so you have to find it with some cleverness...)< /i>
MB: wait, wait, wait, it’s going too fast. I said that the map is a tool, that I know is debated, because Max said the map is not a tool, I say, the map is a tool so who understands what in this terminology ?
(Q - But do you say that the 2nd card is a tool, Michel, can you say the 2nd card is a tool?)< br />
MB: of course, listen to my answer, if you use a 2nd card, it's a tool. Same as the first card. Maps are tools.
No but wait, wait, wait, wait, what would you call it, what terminology do you use to define a map in a treasure hunt, it's a tool, what is it? What would you call that?