(Q - Xavier d'Homan: So we agree that the benchmark can be 400 meters, 100 meters, 1 kilometer, 10 kilometers, there is no distance, it's
is simply that seeing how it started, I assure you that Roc is right, from the moment you are going to say the sentinels it is the last landmark and the word landmark is important because we are talking about physical landmark,
that means..., I'll give you a concrete example, imagine the photo that you took in black and white at the time, we see your stake, your rope, we say to ourselves that the rope is attached to somewhere, that
seems so logical to me, the rope has to start somewhere to calculate the stake that you have planted, but there has to be something at the end and if what is at the end, it
is either a landmark, i.e. the sentinels or it is another landmark.)
MB: Or maybe it’s someone stretching the rope.
(Q - Xavier d’Homan: Yes, but in relation to what that means, I’m willing Michel…)
MB: But I'm not going to tell you in relation to what!
(Q - Xavier: Well no but there is always a reference point, even if the person is holding the rope, they are holding the rope in relation to something, they are not getting into the wind and then... )
MB: Listen, you're right in Crolet's delirium. Crolet, as an expert, explained to me one day in writing that from the moment he spoke of his profession as an expert, where he was capable of detecting, of finding what he calls 12 minutiae, the minutiae are suspicions of clues, but not really clues, and from 12 minutiae we consider that we have a clue, that is Mr. Crolet's way of working, through which he is currently giving us absolutely phenomenal deductions on crows, crow steps, jokers or joker steps.
Well, you are doing exactly the same, you are speculating on a stake and a rope which were placed there for the purposes of an observation, for reasons on which I have already expressed myself, nothing says that the rope is not held by someone, nothing says that it is attached to something else, therefore, you are in the speculations and you make deductions about things which are totally, d 'on the one hand imprecise or uncertain in any case and on the other hand, which do not bring you anything in terms of solving the puzzles.
That's what I don't understand, why insist on it, saying yeah, there's a rope, there's a stake so that means there are 2 stakes, whatever, well, I mean, we are far from the subject, far from the subject…
(Q - Xavier d'Homan: Michel I understood well, don't worry, the story of the rope, it was simply to ask you, because the problem is that there we is at a point, and here I'm not going to be the only one to say that compared to what you sentries answered, it's the last benchmark. That means that if, for example, we imagine that I'm there. cache, well that means that either the cache is near the sentries…)
(Q - ??: Can I add something? I just wanted to tell you that digging is not necessarily digging up, that's all...)
MB: No, but digging is useless if you don't understand the thing, frankly, the possibility of finding it by chance is so tiny that for me it's almost non-existent. It's a complete waste of time and systematic digging, systematic plowing will not find anything, that's what I think.
The 2nd thing I want to say is that even if I say that the sentries are the last marker, that doesn't mean that it's the only one. Therefore, and it's not enough to say, the sentinels, for me that's it, I'm going there; I take my detector, my shovel and I dig everywhere.
(Q - ??: In the Alpha vocal, you would have said that the sentinels are visible by car, is it a legend or is it true?)< br />
MB: No, I've never said anything like that, I've never said anything like that.
MB: Or maybe it’s someone stretching the rope.
(Q - Xavier d’Homan: Yes, but in relation to what that means, I’m willing Michel…)
MB: But I'm not going to tell you in relation to what!
(Q - Xavier: Well no but there is always a reference point, even if the person is holding the rope, they are holding the rope in relation to something, they are not getting into the wind and then... )
MB: Listen, you're right in Crolet's delirium. Crolet, as an expert, explained to me one day in writing that from the moment he spoke of his profession as an expert, where he was capable of detecting, of finding what he calls 12 minutiae, the minutiae are suspicions of clues, but not really clues, and from 12 minutiae we consider that we have a clue, that is Mr. Crolet's way of working, through which he is currently giving us absolutely phenomenal deductions on crows, crow steps, jokers or joker steps.
Well, you are doing exactly the same, you are speculating on a stake and a rope which were placed there for the purposes of an observation, for reasons on which I have already expressed myself, nothing says that the rope is not held by someone, nothing says that it is attached to something else, therefore, you are in the speculations and you make deductions about things which are totally, d 'on the one hand imprecise or uncertain in any case and on the other hand, which do not bring you anything in terms of solving the puzzles.
That's what I don't understand, why insist on it, saying yeah, there's a rope, there's a stake so that means there are 2 stakes, whatever, well, I mean, we are far from the subject, far from the subject…
(Q - Xavier d'Homan: Michel I understood well, don't worry, the story of the rope, it was simply to ask you, because the problem is that there we is at a point, and here I'm not going to be the only one to say that compared to what you sentries answered, it's the last benchmark. That means that if, for example, we imagine that I'm there. cache, well that means that either the cache is near the sentries…)
(Q - ??: Can I add something? I just wanted to tell you that digging is not necessarily digging up, that's all...)
MB: No, but digging is useless if you don't understand the thing, frankly, the possibility of finding it by chance is so tiny that for me it's almost non-existent. It's a complete waste of time and systematic digging, systematic plowing will not find anything, that's what I think.
The 2nd thing I want to say is that even if I say that the sentries are the last marker, that doesn't mean that it's the only one. Therefore, and it's not enough to say, the sentinels, for me that's it, I'm going there; I take my detector, my shovel and I dig everywhere.
(Q - ??: In the Alpha vocal, you would have said that the sentinels are visible by car, is it a legend or is it true?)< br />
MB: No, I've never said anything like that, I've never said anything like that.