(Q - Sylvain: Michel, Hello, I have a question that I haven't been able to place one for a while. I would like to ask you why you keep playing games
of words again and again which are magnificent, but the expression is not a play on words, in Pierrette there is no play on words, what are you playing with that, why make puns on?
the… Why?)
MB: Can I ask you a question in turn?
(Q - Sylvain: Uh yes.)
MB: Do you take yourself seriously?
(Q - Sylvain: In the, in the... I don't know what to answer there.)
MB: So I answer neither. Why would you want us to be serious all the time? Why can't we laugh? Why wouldn't puns have the possible function of disengaging you from a certain number of vague and serious theories that a certain number of people have been working on for years? Why wouldn't the virtue of humor be sovereign in the matter and allow you to find a certain lightness in your reasoning? Tell me. Does it annoy you, does it annoy you that I do this?
(Q - Sylvain: So that's a tricky answer, huh? You put me...)
MB: But answer honestly, I accept it.
(Q - Sylvain: Well if you want, there's a moment when we get into the game and I love it. And then there's a moment when you do so much that we say to ourselves but and we try to look for the things that you could possibly have slipped in, because you said it one evening, I dropped a little something this evening and as a result, there is so much fun, so much humor, of something that we are completely lost.)
(Q - Apollo: I think that laughing is good, eh?)
MB: So wait, if I can still take the time to respond, uh. You're saying, there's so much fuss around all this that we're completely lost, right?
(Q - Sylvain: No, in fact, you make so many puns with key hunting words that well, personally, I am convinced that at one point you make allusions for us help. Is it true or not?
MB: Yes, that’s true.
(Q - Sylvain: Ah, so it's not all humor after all. I'm not dreaming.)
MB: But it's just humor, but it can be useful humor. Look, no, but it's interesting. I (inaudible) not there in this case, what you say is very interesting. The debate is to say do we prefer or would we have preferred because today we don't have so much choice, but is it better to use Minitel , damn seriousness, let's say full of innuendoes, of I can't answer if I told you, I would tell you too much. Do you prefer that or do you prefer much more spontaneous exchanges, where it's as if we were sitting in the same room having a drink and having a good evening, where we talk to each other things and where we joke while telling each other things. It's the debate, it's there and you say to yourself, that annoys me. So I…
Wait, I have another understanding of what you are telling me, if you allow me, I understand that it tickles you, it exasperates you from time to time to say to yourself shit, there are things happening, I don't I can't pick them up but at the same time, I confirm that there are things happening in all of this and I confirm at the same time that in the madits, there was nothing positive happening. In fact, I'm interested in the debate here, if we push the comparison, I would say that taken globally, that's perhaps why I have such an aversion to madits, when I take them globally, when I reread them, when I read the deductions that were made from them, I cited Monglane earlier, who for me is one of the worst commentators there is at the level of the madits, because God knows that he recounts them and It’s better not to get too inspired by it. But when I see that, I tell myself that in fact the curses have only induced doubt and negative things. Me, I think, maybe I'm wrong, but I have the feeling of inducing yes, doubt too, but positive. And that is a fundamental difference.
(Q - Forked tongue: Ok to lighten the mood, can I make a little pun?)
MB: Well, she’s not tense, eh. Yes, of course you can.
(Q - Forked Tongue: So, it's Forked Tongue, eh. I don't whistle and I whist [incomprehensible]… Nobody understood, I think.)< br />
MB: Can I ask you a question in turn?
(Q - Sylvain: Uh yes.)
MB: Do you take yourself seriously?
(Q - Sylvain: In the, in the... I don't know what to answer there.)
MB: So I answer neither. Why would you want us to be serious all the time? Why can't we laugh? Why wouldn't puns have the possible function of disengaging you from a certain number of vague and serious theories that a certain number of people have been working on for years? Why wouldn't the virtue of humor be sovereign in the matter and allow you to find a certain lightness in your reasoning? Tell me. Does it annoy you, does it annoy you that I do this?
(Q - Sylvain: So that's a tricky answer, huh? You put me...)
MB: But answer honestly, I accept it.
(Q - Sylvain: Well if you want, there's a moment when we get into the game and I love it. And then there's a moment when you do so much that we say to ourselves but and we try to look for the things that you could possibly have slipped in, because you said it one evening, I dropped a little something this evening and as a result, there is so much fun, so much humor, of something that we are completely lost.)
(Q - Apollo: I think that laughing is good, eh?)
MB: So wait, if I can still take the time to respond, uh. You're saying, there's so much fuss around all this that we're completely lost, right?
(Q - Sylvain: No, in fact, you make so many puns with key hunting words that well, personally, I am convinced that at one point you make allusions for us help. Is it true or not?
MB: Yes, that’s true.
(Q - Sylvain: Ah, so it's not all humor after all. I'm not dreaming.)
MB: But it's just humor, but it can be useful humor. Look, no, but it's interesting. I (inaudible) not there in this case, what you say is very interesting. The debate is to say do we prefer or would we have preferred because today we don't have so much choice, but is it better to use Minitel , damn seriousness, let's say full of innuendoes, of I can't answer if I told you, I would tell you too much. Do you prefer that or do you prefer much more spontaneous exchanges, where it's as if we were sitting in the same room having a drink and having a good evening, where we talk to each other things and where we joke while telling each other things. It's the debate, it's there and you say to yourself, that annoys me. So I…
Wait, I have another understanding of what you are telling me, if you allow me, I understand that it tickles you, it exasperates you from time to time to say to yourself shit, there are things happening, I don't I can't pick them up but at the same time, I confirm that there are things happening in all of this and I confirm at the same time that in the madits, there was nothing positive happening. In fact, I'm interested in the debate here, if we push the comparison, I would say that taken globally, that's perhaps why I have such an aversion to madits, when I take them globally, when I reread them, when I read the deductions that were made from them, I cited Monglane earlier, who for me is one of the worst commentators there is at the level of the madits, because God knows that he recounts them and It’s better not to get too inspired by it. But when I see that, I tell myself that in fact the curses have only induced doubt and negative things. Me, I think, maybe I'm wrong, but I have the feeling of inducing yes, doubt too, but positive. And that is a fundamental difference.
(Q - Forked tongue: Ok to lighten the mood, can I make a little pun?)
MB: Well, she’s not tense, eh. Yes, of course you can.
(Q - Forked Tongue: So, it's Forked Tongue, eh. I don't whistle and I whist [incomprehensible]… Nobody understood, I think.)< br />