(Q - Apollo: In summary, finally, to follow up on what the researcher said, we review the sentries and on one of the sentries, there is something that calls out to us, et cetera
, which sends us directly to the spot )
.
MB: I didn't say anything about one of the sentries, I never said that. There's no point trying to make me say it, for God's sake, you're asking me questions in such a way that if I answer spontaneously, we'll end up in endless interpretations. There I would have said yes, immediately, we're leaving. Ah, there is only one sentinel that needs to be considered, but that's correct, but no, but you are excused without any problem but then I won't be excused if I give a response like that, I'm taking myself once again 300 messages telling me you say too much, you shouldn't have said that. Is there really only one sentry and so on? We must be careful with our interactions.
(Q - Apollo: So we review the sentries, we look at them, there you go, we observe them. And then TAC, there is something that makes us tilt and then it sends us to a spot .)
MB: You could say it like that.
.
MB: I didn't say anything about one of the sentries, I never said that. There's no point trying to make me say it, for God's sake, you're asking me questions in such a way that if I answer spontaneously, we'll end up in endless interpretations. There I would have said yes, immediately, we're leaving. Ah, there is only one sentinel that needs to be considered, but that's correct, but no, but you are excused without any problem but then I won't be excused if I give a response like that, I'm taking myself once again 300 messages telling me you say too much, you shouldn't have said that. Is there really only one sentry and so on? We must be careful with our interactions.
(Q - Apollo: So we review the sentries, we look at them, there you go, we observe them. And then TAC, there is something that makes us tilt and then it sends us to a spot .)
MB: You could say it like that.