(Q - Apollon: I have a question about Pierrette, are we going to start again, are we going to talk about something else? Yes, it will change us. Come on, we're talking about Pierrette, so Pierrette. Okay Well
Well, you said to me, the first thing that I think about is the Rosetta Stone. Well, you said it.
not very long ago and so my question will be direct. Does Pierrette refer or appeal more or less to Egyptology or things of that sort?)
MB: I have already said something that seems sufficient to me about Pierrette's few lines, namely that they contain key words. On the rest, I don't have to express myself, you think what you want, but my approach was to give you a few key words.
(Q - Apollo: But so Rosetta Stone finally makes you think of Egyptology so you don't want to answer?) MB: So wait, first when you say, I don't want to respond, it's not necessarily a desire, it could be that I can't respond, which you seem to exclude and then it could also be that it is not desirable for me to respond because , as you know, my answers are frequently over-interpreted and therefore I prefer to refrain from answering this specific question of Egyptology by specifying again what seems decisive to me about this text, which is that it contains keywords.
(Q - MacDo: Pierrette can be used to clarify words that are not clear in the golden owl, potentially?)
MB: Are you sure, are you really sure?
(Q - MacDo: No, but key words that resonate with words that are not as clearly defined as you explained in…)
MB: You are incorrigible, period.
(Q - MacDo: Ok very well, it's no, but it's very clear. And speaking of reflex keywords, I arrive at 650 example eh, I have a door. I say to myself well, I'm stupid, it's true, I had found a key previously, I'm in the reflex there we agree, I'm not in any leftover situation.)< /i>
MB: When you talk about doors, we're not talking about skiing, eh.
(Q - McDonald's: No, there's a door, a door with a lock where I arrive in 650.)
MB: You realize that if I answer that, you think I'm joking but not at all when I tell you we're not talking about skiing. If I answer you on the door, I will have 150 private messages which will tell me is there really a door? I still have to be careful because I'm a victim after all, eh. No, I'm not exaggerating at all. No, if you see the messages I receive, I'm not exaggerating, it's phenomenal all the same, there is a total unlocking of the players' imagination which is limitless! It is necessary, yes it is necessary but it must be channeled.
MB: I have already said something that seems sufficient to me about Pierrette's few lines, namely that they contain key words. On the rest, I don't have to express myself, you think what you want, but my approach was to give you a few key words.
(Q - Apollo: But so Rosetta Stone finally makes you think of Egyptology so you don't want to answer?) MB: So wait, first when you say, I don't want to respond, it's not necessarily a desire, it could be that I can't respond, which you seem to exclude and then it could also be that it is not desirable for me to respond because , as you know, my answers are frequently over-interpreted and therefore I prefer to refrain from answering this specific question of Egyptology by specifying again what seems decisive to me about this text, which is that it contains keywords.
(Q - MacDo: Pierrette can be used to clarify words that are not clear in the golden owl, potentially?)
MB: Are you sure, are you really sure?
(Q - MacDo: No, but key words that resonate with words that are not as clearly defined as you explained in…)
MB: You are incorrigible, period.
(Q - MacDo: Ok very well, it's no, but it's very clear. And speaking of reflex keywords, I arrive at 650 example eh, I have a door. I say to myself well, I'm stupid, it's true, I had found a key previously, I'm in the reflex there we agree, I'm not in any leftover situation.)< /i>
MB: When you talk about doors, we're not talking about skiing, eh.
(Q - McDonald's: No, there's a door, a door with a lock where I arrive in 650.)
MB: You realize that if I answer that, you think I'm joking but not at all when I tell you we're not talking about skiing. If I answer you on the door, I will have 150 private messages which will tell me is there really a door? I still have to be careful because I'm a victim after all, eh. No, I'm not exaggerating at all. No, if you see the messages I receive, I'm not exaggerating, it's phenomenal all the same, there is a total unlocking of the players' imagination which is limitless! It is necessary, yes it is necessary but it must be channeled.