(Q - The artist: Michel is the artist speaking. Hello, compared to the 650 in the 2 versions that exist between now that you have wings, take flight
fly north-northeast 11 degrees and after the time where it is changed to back to the side looking for the sentries, would you say in fact that we arrive at exactly the same place with the 2 versions?)
u>
MB: So what I can tell you because to be completely sincere, I haven't gone through the ins and outs of all the expressions and all the nuances that have punctuated the history of enigmas. So the differences that we can find there, the different versions etc., I have not tried to go into detail about all that. On the other hand, the solutions that I have, that I hold, so I still remind you, because it is not uninteresting, that there is only one copy of the solutions, not 2, 1 only unlike Moreover, according to what our gravedigger from Louveciennes says on his site, the original bailiff does not have the solutions. He testified before the Versailles court to say that he was only in charge of the settlement. So there you have it, there is no solution from the bailiff. The only copy is that of the floppy disk that I have. So, on the basis of these solutions which are very precise, which were embellished with a certain number of comments a posteriori by Max Valentin himself, concerning the way in which he buried the countermark and what system he put in place . This is all well explained. From there, I can affirm to you, confirm to you, repeat to you that there is only one solution to these enigmas, only one in one place and that it is impossible that it could be elsewhere, therefore, what whatever version you consider, whether it is Father Méhus version 1 version 2 whatever version, in any case, it always leads to the same place. There is only one place, there is only one specific point, there are not 2.
(Q - The artist: Ok so it's just a way of seeing things differently in relation to this text but the finality, there is really only one place that can be OK but it's good, compared to that because I have a little difficulty in orienting myself, different ways of… I'm a little in doubt and sometimes I hesitate about which version and I would like although it matches with the 2 in fact, I try to match with the 2?)
MB: I understand you, but I remind you of what I said earlier, namely that we were dealing at the time with someone who had just organized one or two surprise rallies in his life. So there was a bit of vagueness, a bit of uncertainty, a way of directing things in this or that version that he more or less clarified, that he was able to amend, that he was able to correct to different reasons. But we weren't dealing with an expert at all, so it may be that in certain versions things are a little more vague, a little more imprecise than others, or a little less precise. But in any case, the solution is always the same, that’s a certainty.
MB: So what I can tell you because to be completely sincere, I haven't gone through the ins and outs of all the expressions and all the nuances that have punctuated the history of enigmas. So the differences that we can find there, the different versions etc., I have not tried to go into detail about all that. On the other hand, the solutions that I have, that I hold, so I still remind you, because it is not uninteresting, that there is only one copy of the solutions, not 2, 1 only unlike Moreover, according to what our gravedigger from Louveciennes says on his site, the original bailiff does not have the solutions. He testified before the Versailles court to say that he was only in charge of the settlement. So there you have it, there is no solution from the bailiff. The only copy is that of the floppy disk that I have. So, on the basis of these solutions which are very precise, which were embellished with a certain number of comments a posteriori by Max Valentin himself, concerning the way in which he buried the countermark and what system he put in place . This is all well explained. From there, I can affirm to you, confirm to you, repeat to you that there is only one solution to these enigmas, only one in one place and that it is impossible that it could be elsewhere, therefore, what whatever version you consider, whether it is Father Méhus version 1 version 2 whatever version, in any case, it always leads to the same place. There is only one place, there is only one specific point, there are not 2.
(Q - The artist: Ok so it's just a way of seeing things differently in relation to this text but the finality, there is really only one place that can be OK but it's good, compared to that because I have a little difficulty in orienting myself, different ways of… I'm a little in doubt and sometimes I hesitate about which version and I would like although it matches with the 2 in fact, I try to match with the 2?)
MB: I understand you, but I remind you of what I said earlier, namely that we were dealing at the time with someone who had just organized one or two surprise rallies in his life. So there was a bit of vagueness, a bit of uncertainty, a way of directing things in this or that version that he more or less clarified, that he was able to amend, that he was able to correct to different reasons. But we weren't dealing with an expert at all, so it may be that in certain versions things are a little more vague, a little more imprecise than others, or a little less precise. But in any case, the solution is always the same, that’s a certainty.