(Q - ??: Michel I have a question about the 2nd card in fact, because you said that the 2nd card was not necessarily necessary but that it could reassure us to check certain
By redoing the lines, in any case on the 2nd map because in any case I need to reassure myself that I don't have quite the same lines or the same angles, etc., By.
against I always arrive at the same understanding. Should we follow an understanding of the first card or follow exactly what to do on the 2nd since we don't have exactly…)
MB: I remind you that at the start of the game it was a question of a card not 2 eh..
(Q - ?? so we have to rely more on the first card with the yeahs, but we can have on it…)
MB: the 2nd card is belt and suspenders. There you go.
(Q - ??: yeah, that's me in any case, I don't follow exactly the same lines even though there is the same understanding, in any case in relation to my angles, what I can find in distance etc.)
MB: there are no lines to be made on the 2nd map, as far as I know. That was never asked, it's not part of the requirements, the things required in the game. We're talking about the layout on the first map but not on the 2nd map. If you want to do it yourself…
(Q - ??: no, then there are very, very nice coincidences then...)
MB: there is no coincidence, in the game when we talk about the 2nd card, we talk about the end of the game, there is no coincidence, there are factual elements. A coincidence can only be fortuitous.
(Q - ??: no, absolutely, but in relation in fact, to certain lengths, in fact, which is given in the hunt, therefore in the book reported on the 2nd card or other in any case in relation to my perched black ship and to the other information that I can find in the texts It is true that I obtain angles or things which are similar to what I could obtain on the first map,. but we are going to say the same understanding, but not quite the same lines But then yes, it is true that it is perhaps wrong to redo the lines on the 2nd map and that we must follow exactly what. There is on the first. But it's true that the understanding was really a little different compared to the 2nd card.)
MB: well turn there, you will be more comfortable.
MB: I remind you that at the start of the game it was a question of a card not 2 eh..
(Q - ?? so we have to rely more on the first card with the yeahs, but we can have on it…)
MB: the 2nd card is belt and suspenders. There you go.
(Q - ??: yeah, that's me in any case, I don't follow exactly the same lines even though there is the same understanding, in any case in relation to my angles, what I can find in distance etc.)
MB: there are no lines to be made on the 2nd map, as far as I know. That was never asked, it's not part of the requirements, the things required in the game. We're talking about the layout on the first map but not on the 2nd map. If you want to do it yourself…
(Q - ??: no, then there are very, very nice coincidences then...)
MB: there is no coincidence, in the game when we talk about the 2nd card, we talk about the end of the game, there is no coincidence, there are factual elements. A coincidence can only be fortuitous.
(Q - ??: no, absolutely, but in relation in fact, to certain lengths, in fact, which is given in the hunt, therefore in the book reported on the 2nd card or other in any case in relation to my perched black ship and to the other information that I can find in the texts It is true that I obtain angles or things which are similar to what I could obtain on the first map,. but we are going to say the same understanding, but not quite the same lines But then yes, it is true that it is perhaps wrong to redo the lines on the 2nd map and that we must follow exactly what. There is on the first. But it's true that the understanding was really a little different compared to the 2nd card.)
MB: well turn there, you will be more comfortable.