MB: It’s a Camelot job, it was a job.
Today, it no longer exists, but it was a profession, a real profession and a real talent.
People who had a way of talking, who had vocabulary, who had empathy, who had a certain charisma to hook people, to stop them at the moment when they looked at him a little askance.
Hop, they grabbed the passerby and sold him something.
That's how you have to conceive of the thing, that is to say this astute, clever, cunning, a little side of the character.
So he imagined something which is at that level, a trick. And when I say it could perfectly have found its place in a pirate story, it's the absolute truth. It's a combination that would have been entirely possible for scenarios such as those of Pirates of the Caribbean or others. It can quite take its place in a classic treasure hunt if I may say so, it's a tip that I personally find very well done.
It’s a great find and there you go. Well, it’s clever, it’s clever. What would you have done in his place? Ask yourself the question in this sense. But don't go looking for things in the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th degree and then this and then whatever and I saw that in such and such a treatise we find the reference to this but no, but no, but no, but no , but no.
(Q - ??: would you say it makes sense?)
MB: Yes, there is, there is logic eh, there is necessarily a bit of logic, otherwise it would be completely stupid to have done that. Just as if we take up this famous story of aiming into the eye through the eye of the skull to point to the place where the Treasure is buried, there is a certain logic, but there are the trick in that. Well yes, the trick… we create a viewfinder with a skull and by looking into PAF we see exactly where we need to dig. Well, it's not that at all but it's at the same level of cleverness. There is a find.
So he imagined something which is at that level, a trick. And when I say it could perfectly have found its place in a pirate story, it's the absolute truth. It's a combination that would have been entirely possible for scenarios such as those of Pirates of the Caribbean or others. It can quite take its place in a classic treasure hunt if I may say so, it's a tip that I personally find very well done.
It’s a great find and there you go. Well, it’s clever, it’s clever. What would you have done in his place? Ask yourself the question in this sense. But don't go looking for things in the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th degree and then this and then whatever and I saw that in such and such a treatise we find the reference to this but no, but no, but no, but no , but no.
(Q - ??: would you say it makes sense?)
MB: Yes, there is, there is logic eh, there is necessarily a bit of logic, otherwise it would be completely stupid to have done that. Just as if we take up this famous story of aiming into the eye through the eye of the skull to point to the place where the Treasure is buried, there is a certain logic, but there are the trick in that. Well yes, the trick… we create a viewfinder with a skull and by looking into PAF we see exactly where we need to dig. Well, it's not that at all but it's at the same level of cleverness. There is a find.