(Q - BuBzZz: well it's quite incredible to see that in just a few weeks, the number of madits posted per minute has dropped drastically, but we see that right away, it's
is clear There is also one thing, afterwards, in the exchanges, which is that of course, you understand it because we are asking the questions on the way of thinking, but as in fact no one is going to give them, one.
solution which would relate to the good one, so in my opinion trying to touch on what… are the owls really close to the end or not and who are in the right mode of reflection, yes,?
We can pick that up, but you actually, with MPs, you also have this advantage of being able to really know where we are in concrete terms in the progress of the hunt. I think a lot of people confide.
)
MB: yes, but that’s really the secret garden, that’s something I don’t comment on. But here I'm not referring to that at all, I'm referring to the exchanges that I can see most of them in writing, indeed more than orally, but really from what I see, the questions become, the exchanges... it's not not just the questions, it's the questions, the answers, the exchanges, overall, the subjects for reflection, the themes for reflection are becoming more and more relevant. That’s a certainty.
I would even say that I have seen certain exchanges where there are players who flirt with the solution, that is, there are some who have it, but they don't realize it. What's very, very disturbing to me is that I see him going through this and I say to myself, but they don't realize what they're saying, they're saying things, they're bringing up things and they're don't even realize that that's what, yes, yes.
(Q - BuBzZz: what is blocking things today, knowing that we are indeed far removed from Max's comments? We have moved away from that, so we should be precisely on a new way of thinking and yet you see that we still can't get over the hump?)
MB: well you know, there are a lot of parameters, there are many, many parameters. There is the character of Max Valentin, well, I talked about it, some think that I have revenge to wreak or God knows what, others think that on the contrary, I say very measured things, there are really the 2 extremes and then all the nuances between the 2, there are those who think that I'm a little old, I don't really understand everything well, I fell in there and then I don't quite understand understood what it was to be an owl, and then I didn't make the journey, then I didn't feel what they felt. There are some who think that… there are really big names in hunting, historical big names, that we must always refer to them. There are all these parameters which make completely objective judgment relatively difficult for a player today. Because even a new person, someone who arrives today, someone who arrived 2 months ago, 3 months ago, 6 months ago, a year or a year and a half or 2 years, because I have been on the course for 2 years.
What he does, well, he will still compile the Internet pages, he will look, he will listen, he will look a little on the other forums, he will try to understand, to learn, to inspire and inevitably it is influenced, which means that when we look for solutions on the Internet, at the same time we are confronted with lots of theories and at the same time we are influenced. And therefore, today, when I try to give a, to deliver a message as I did with our now famous Pierrette. Well yes, but what did he really mean? Is this, is that that when in fact we should take a text like that and say, well, he throws something at us, we peel it, we don't wonder if he wanted this or if he wanted that, we go through the text, but because of the history of hunting, there is a sort of I don't know how to say, a sort of imprint, a sort of yeah, I would say of a canvas which is grafted onto all participants, because there is too much information, there are I don't know how many millions of pages on the Internet that deal with the golden owl, so it is very difficult today to approach it with a completely new and objective eye. And yet, there are some who are, there are some who are not far away.
MB: yes, but that’s really the secret garden, that’s something I don’t comment on. But here I'm not referring to that at all, I'm referring to the exchanges that I can see most of them in writing, indeed more than orally, but really from what I see, the questions become, the exchanges... it's not not just the questions, it's the questions, the answers, the exchanges, overall, the subjects for reflection, the themes for reflection are becoming more and more relevant. That’s a certainty.
I would even say that I have seen certain exchanges where there are players who flirt with the solution, that is, there are some who have it, but they don't realize it. What's very, very disturbing to me is that I see him going through this and I say to myself, but they don't realize what they're saying, they're saying things, they're bringing up things and they're don't even realize that that's what, yes, yes.
(Q - BuBzZz: what is blocking things today, knowing that we are indeed far removed from Max's comments? We have moved away from that, so we should be precisely on a new way of thinking and yet you see that we still can't get over the hump?)
MB: well you know, there are a lot of parameters, there are many, many parameters. There is the character of Max Valentin, well, I talked about it, some think that I have revenge to wreak or God knows what, others think that on the contrary, I say very measured things, there are really the 2 extremes and then all the nuances between the 2, there are those who think that I'm a little old, I don't really understand everything well, I fell in there and then I don't quite understand understood what it was to be an owl, and then I didn't make the journey, then I didn't feel what they felt. There are some who think that… there are really big names in hunting, historical big names, that we must always refer to them. There are all these parameters which make completely objective judgment relatively difficult for a player today. Because even a new person, someone who arrives today, someone who arrived 2 months ago, 3 months ago, 6 months ago, a year or a year and a half or 2 years, because I have been on the course for 2 years.
What he does, well, he will still compile the Internet pages, he will look, he will listen, he will look a little on the other forums, he will try to understand, to learn, to inspire and inevitably it is influenced, which means that when we look for solutions on the Internet, at the same time we are confronted with lots of theories and at the same time we are influenced. And therefore, today, when I try to give a, to deliver a message as I did with our now famous Pierrette. Well yes, but what did he really mean? Is this, is that that when in fact we should take a text like that and say, well, he throws something at us, we peel it, we don't wonder if he wanted this or if he wanted that, we go through the text, but because of the history of hunting, there is a sort of I don't know how to say, a sort of imprint, a sort of yeah, I would say of a canvas which is grafted onto all participants, because there is too much information, there are I don't know how many millions of pages on the Internet that deal with the golden owl, so it is very difficult today to approach it with a completely new and objective eye. And yet, there are some who are, there are some who are not far away.