Moteur de recherche & Synthèse des "Midits" sur le jeu "Sur la trace de la Chouette d'Or ®"

<< Back

03/05/2023 - Vocal n° 57 - 01:13:50 :50: Discord - Evolution of exchanges - Relevant questions

(Q - finder: I do indeed have the impression of being part of this global community. But then as a finder I perhaps don't have the same perspective as you obviously, since we are in our game and also we perhaps have more affinities with people who share the same tracks, for example the Daboists are going to be together, we have the impression that it is the most predominant group in terms of volume, but we are not necessarily aware of other groups, things like that So maybe you want to mention, these parts I imagine when you talk about groups and group tendencies?).

MB: well, in fact what I manage to perceive in what I pick up from the exchanges on the discord is that there are major trends. There are discussions that concern a way of approaching so, for now, I'm not talking about the end of the game or anything, I'm talking about the whole game, all the solutions .
There are reasonings today that have fundamentally changed over the past 2 years. For example, obviously, the most obvious example is the story of the madits, that is to say that now, I think that everyone..., I laugh a little moreover, every time that, it's rare, but every time I go for a stroll on the A2CO forum, I see that it has also become commonplace there, everyone says well, the madits are worth taking and to leave.
I mean, 2 years ago, it was a thing, we'd get banned from A2CO in no time if we said something like that today, it's become common practice. Well, I'm exaggerating a bit, but it's still not false. That's the first point. And then in the exchanges that I try to follow on the discord, I realize that the questions are more and more relevant, that the exchanges are more and more constructive, I think that's the right word. better, that is to say that I see less and less… apart from well, apart from this eternal schism since the origin of the game of the Daboists and the anti-Daboists, that is really the schism irreparable but apart from that, exchanges are much more open.
The thoughts are much broader. And the direction of the questions is moving more and more in the right direction. I can see that, I am the only one who can see it. Obviously, you cannot measure it but from the moment, what interests me to know, is that from the moment I express myself by saying, in a general way, the questions go into common sense, are more relevant, the research is better oriented, does that make sense for you Daboists or anti-Daboists for that matter, does everyone understand that overall, the reflections are better oriented? Or do you say to yourself, yeah, but hey, he's addressing people who understood, I didn't understand, that's the real question.